2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased litterfall contributes to carbon and nitrogen accumulation following cessation of anthropogenic disturbances in degraded forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In each month, samples collected from each trap were transported to the laboratory and transferred from plastic bags to paper bags, where they were then dried at 70°C until a constant mass was achieved (72 hr), at which point dry biomass was weighed. The annual litterfall productivity of each plot was calculated by summing dry litterfall biomass collected for the period of one full calendar year (Mg ha −1 year −1 ) (Feng, Wang, Ma, Fu, & Chen, ). Although the litterfall collection was conducted from different years in our study (from September 2013 to September 2014 in Tiantong, Shuangfeng and Nanshan; from February 2015 to January 2016 in Putuo and Logar), we found that the interyear variation in annual litterfall productivity did not significantly differ in the plots (Putuo and Logar) that were repeatedly sampled over 3 years (Figure ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each month, samples collected from each trap were transported to the laboratory and transferred from plastic bags to paper bags, where they were then dried at 70°C until a constant mass was achieved (72 hr), at which point dry biomass was weighed. The annual litterfall productivity of each plot was calculated by summing dry litterfall biomass collected for the period of one full calendar year (Mg ha −1 year −1 ) (Feng, Wang, Ma, Fu, & Chen, ). Although the litterfall collection was conducted from different years in our study (from September 2013 to September 2014 in Tiantong, Shuangfeng and Nanshan; from February 2015 to January 2016 in Putuo and Logar), we found that the interyear variation in annual litterfall productivity did not significantly differ in the plots (Putuo and Logar) that were repeatedly sampled over 3 years (Figure ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b). Indeed, some studies have reported higher litterfall at later successional stages (Martius et al 2004;Lawrence 2005;Chave et al 2009;Feng et al 2019), whereas other studies have shown that litter mass is higher at early and intermediate stages because of the abundance of herbaceous, shrubby and small pioneer tree species that have high aerial biomass (Ewel 1976;Vendrami et al 2012). In our study, litterfall was negatively correlated with the abundance of pioneer tree species in the plots, but our inclusion criteria (diameter at breast height ≥ 5 cm) underestimates the biomass of a vegetation layer (herbs and shrubs) that probably contributes substantially to litter deposition in early successional stages.…”
Section: Annual and Successional Variations In Litterfall Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At coarser spatial scales (i.e., regional or global), above-ground biomass and decomposition rates in TDFs increase with mean annual precipitation (Martínez-Yrízar 1995;Becknell et al 2012;Gei and Powers 2014). The amount of litterfall is directly related to above-ground biomass accumulation (Lawrence 2005;Chave et al 2009;Feng et al 2019) and therefore affected by soil traits involved in forest growth (Peña-Claros et al 2012;Yazaki et al 2016) and vegetative phenology (Holbrook et al 1995;Giraldo and Holbrook 2011). Usually, litter production is lower for vegetation types growing on nutrient-poor soils, especially those limited in phosphorus (P) (Alvarez-Clare et al 2013; Alvarez-Clare and Mack 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, one review study reported that the litterfall mass of a boreal forest was on the low end, whereas that of a tropical forest was on the high end (Bray and Gorham 1964). Many studies have demonstrated that on a local scale litterfall in forest ecosystems is dependent on forest type, species composition, forest age, soil fertility, and disturbances (Bray and Gorham 1964;Liu et al 2004;Wang et al 2016;Lin et al 2017;Feng et al 2019). A disturbance, which refers to a temporary change in environmental conditions, may have the most profound effects on the amount and pattern of litterfall because of the changes caused to the ecological and physiological processes of the forest (Lodge et al 1991;Lin et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%