2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Neural Processing of Rewarding and Aversive Food Stimuli in Recovered Anorexia Nervosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
204
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
17
204
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, premorbid traits may predispose to such changes. Carr's study (2007) also indicated that brain reward responses persist after weight recovery, which could indicate that alterations in AN during the underweight state persist long into the recovered state, which could be consistent with Cowdrey et al (2011) findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, premorbid traits may predispose to such changes. Carr's study (2007) also indicated that brain reward responses persist after weight recovery, which could indicate that alterations in AN during the underweight state persist long into the recovered state, which could be consistent with Cowdrey et al (2011) findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The application of repeated and predictable, vs random and unpredictable taste stimulus receipt most likely accounted for the opposite study results, as unexpected rather than predictable stimulation is related to dopamine activation (Schultz, 2002). The results of our study, together with Cowdrey et al (2011), of heightened brain reward response could be a biomarker of altered brain function in AN, potentially related to brain dopamine. It is unclear whether those alterations are premorbid or develop during the course of illness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…42,43 A relatively large number of neuroimaging studies in patients with anorexia nervosa have reported group differ ences in this brain region (Appendix 1, Table S9). Most of these studies tested cue reactivity to visual or actual food stimuli and reported either insula hypo 8,9,44,45 or hyperactiv ity 6,44,46 in patients with anorexia nervosa compared with con trols. Studies investigating body image processing have yielded equally heterogeneous results with either reduced 47 or increased 48,49 insula responses to self images in patients with anorexia nervosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%