2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Tidal Dissipation Using Advanced Rheological Models: Implications for Io and Tidally Active Exoplanets

Abstract: The advanced rheological models of Andrade (1910) and Sundberg & Cooper (2010) are compared to the traditional Maxwell model to understand how each affects the tidal dissipation of heat within rocky bodies. We find both the Andrade and Sundberg-Cooper rheologies can produce at least 10× the tidal heating compared to a traditional Maxwell model for a warm (1400-1600 K) Io-like satellite. Sundberg-Cooper can cause even larger dissipation around a critical temperature and frequency. These models allow cooler pla… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
(234 reference statements)
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Viscosities lower than 10 14 Pa s seem unlikely unless the body is largely icy or has an extremely high degree of partial melt (e.g., Bierson & Nimmo 2016;Barr et al 2018;Renaud & Henning 2018). We therefore prefer a high viscosity scenario for these planets, which lowers the effectiveness of planet-forced tidal heating relative to eccentricity-forcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Viscosities lower than 10 14 Pa s seem unlikely unless the body is largely icy or has an extremely high degree of partial melt (e.g., Bierson & Nimmo 2016;Barr et al 2018;Renaud & Henning 2018). We therefore prefer a high viscosity scenario for these planets, which lowers the effectiveness of planet-forced tidal heating relative to eccentricity-forcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute amount of tidal dissipation due to planet-forcing is very much of interest, but we caution that this strongly depends on the assumed rheological model and interior structure of the body. Maxwellian rheologies can greatly underestimate the amount of possible tidal dissipation, as has been demonstrated for the Jovian satellite Io (Bierson & Nimmo 2016;Renaud & Henning 2018). For that reason we do not focus on the absolute amount of tidal heating, but rather the heating ratio between these two modes of tidal forcing.…”
Section: Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If a body is sufficiently nonhomogeneous (i.e., has a molten interior or differentiation, such as found in high-mass moons such as Europa), fixed Q becomes less valid and viscoelastic models must be invoked (see Renaud & Henning 2018 for a recent review). These are more complex and describe more underlying physics, accounting for motion in the mantle; however, since we focus on small, icy moons that lack fully molten interiors, a simpler and phenomenological approach is sufficient.…”
Section: Approaches To Tidal Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Andrade creep model has been introduced in the astronomical community by Efroimsky and Lainey (2007) and Efroimsky (2012b,a). In comparison with more standard rheologies, it can significantly affect the probability of capture in spin-orbit resonance and/or amplify the amount of dissipated energy (Makarov and Efroimsky, 2013;Leconte et al, 2015;Makarov, 2015;Makarov et al, 2016;Walterová and Běhounková, 2017;Renaud and Henning, 2018). The Andrade rheology has been applied in studies of specific celestial bodies such as the Moon (Nimmo et al, 2012;Williams et al, 2014;Williams and Boggs, 2015), Mercury (Padovan et al, 2014;Noyelles et al, 2014;Knibbe and van Westrenen, 2017), Enceladus (Rambaux et al, 2010;Shoji et al, 2013;Běhounková et al, 2013Běhounková et al, , 2015Souček et al, 2019), Iapetus , Io (Bierson and Nimmo, 2016), binary asteroids (Efroimsky, 2015), GJ581 d (Makarov et al, 2012), and Proxima Century b (Ribas et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%