1998
DOI: 10.1021/es980343l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increases in Total and Methylmercury in Zooplankton following Flooding of a Peatland Reservoir

Abstract: Fish from new reservoirs often have elevated concentrations of methylmercury (MeHg) that they primarily accumulate from food such as zooplankton. The objectives of this research were (i) to determine the effect of reservoir creation on total mercury (THg) and MeHg in zooplankton and (ii) to examine how variations in community structure and water chemistry affect MeHg bioaccumulation by zooplankton. Beginning in June 1992, we measured concentrations of THg and MeHg in zooplankton from an experimental reservoir … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In bio-magnification and energy and matter transfer in a pelagic food web, zooplankton is considered a crucial link between the primary producers and fish. In bio-energetic models, zooplankton are categorized as a "source" [56], or pooled into a singular grouping [57] of the trophic level of 2 [58,59], without taking into account species-specific traits or differences in life stage. Because the relative biomass of zooplankton taxa can significantly change during a calendar year [60], and because trophic positions of taxa and their relationships are dynamic during the year, we can conclude that freshwater zooplankton cannot be clustered together in the same ecological compartment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bio-magnification and energy and matter transfer in a pelagic food web, zooplankton is considered a crucial link between the primary producers and fish. In bio-energetic models, zooplankton are categorized as a "source" [56], or pooled into a singular grouping [57] of the trophic level of 2 [58,59], without taking into account species-specific traits or differences in life stage. Because the relative biomass of zooplankton taxa can significantly change during a calendar year [60], and because trophic positions of taxa and their relationships are dynamic during the year, we can conclude that freshwater zooplankton cannot be clustered together in the same ecological compartment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…à References: 1, this study; 2, E. Henry, personal communication; 3, Slotton et al (1995); 4, Back et al (2002Back et al ( , 20035, Jackson (1988);6, Meili and Parkman (1988);7, Watras and Bloom (1992); 8, Plourde et al (1997); 9, Monson and Brezonik (1998); 10, Paterson et al (1998);11, Watras et al (1998);12, Chen et al (2000); 13, Kainz and Lucotte (2002);14, Gorski et al (2003). of the same factors identified above may play important roles in controlling the abundance and/or biomass of these species, but no additional data on those parameters were collected for the present study (primarily post-1992).…”
Section: Temporal Trendsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Zooplankton samples were taken and prepared for methylmercury analysis as described previously (34). H. azteca invertebrate samples were collected by kick-sampling and sweep-netting of epilimnetic sediments and prepared for analysis as described elsewhere (27).…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%