2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing biodiversity in wood-pastures by protecting small shrubby patches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result agrees with previous studies on the role played by nurse species and facilitation as biodiversity drivers in severe environments (McIntire and Fajardo 2014;Le Bagousse-Pinguet et al 2014;Cavieres et al 2014;Gonzalez and Ghermandi 2019), supporting the fact that their protection should be a primary focus for management and conservation strategies in order to prevent the loss of diversity and functioning of these ecosystems (Valiente-Banuet et al 2015;Maestre et al 2016). A high nestedness of diversity could imply to focus on the conservation of only the more diverse sites or patches (Socolar et al 2016;Oksuz et al 2020). However, our results revealed that species turnover was still higher than the nestedness of assemblages in all study sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This result agrees with previous studies on the role played by nurse species and facilitation as biodiversity drivers in severe environments (McIntire and Fajardo 2014;Le Bagousse-Pinguet et al 2014;Cavieres et al 2014;Gonzalez and Ghermandi 2019), supporting the fact that their protection should be a primary focus for management and conservation strategies in order to prevent the loss of diversity and functioning of these ecosystems (Valiente-Banuet et al 2015;Maestre et al 2016). A high nestedness of diversity could imply to focus on the conservation of only the more diverse sites or patches (Socolar et al 2016;Oksuz et al 2020). However, our results revealed that species turnover was still higher than the nestedness of assemblages in all study sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While our survey plots on large graveyards harbored a particularly high diversity of plant species, even small family graveyards appear to play important roles in conserving the plant species richness in the agricultural land-use matrix. The potential importance of small habitat patches for biodiversity conservation is well established 10 , 13 , 41 , 42 . Even the smallest graveyard (2 m 2 ) with its 12 plant species already represents a distinct diversity ‘hotspot’ in the highly homogenous intensively cultivated agricultural landscape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abundance and richness of lizards is greater when the understorey shrubby vegetation increases, as it protects them from predators, and is also related to low stocking rates [52,53]. Oksuz et al [54] demonstrated that the presence of small shrub patches (252-3000 m 2 ) substantially increased species richness for plants, lichens, and coleopterans as they contain very different species assemblages from in the wood-pasture matrix. Ramirez-Hernández et al [46] and Cárdenas et al [48] have detected a greater richness of saproxylic beetles in areas with scarce shrub cover and note that open areas contain greater amounts of accumulated dead wood, which favours saproxylic populations.…”
Section: Shrub Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the diversity of saproxylic syrphid species mainly depends on the shrub cover and diversity, which provide sources of pollen and nectar for feeding. Beetles are trophically diverse, and shrubby patches serve as feeding resources, breeding sites, shelter, and microclimate refuges [54]. For example, García-Tejero and Taboada [47] found that microhabitats of scattered shrubs in wood pastures contained a high richness in carabid (seed-eaters and predators) species.…”
Section: Shrub Factormentioning
confidence: 99%