Background: While cervical cancer is a major cause of mortality, its progress and survival rate can be improved through screening. Yet despite their wide availability, women's participation in cervical cancer screening (CCS) programs is often suboptimal, especially in low-and middle-income countries. Besides demographic and organizational characteristics, screening uptake is influenced by psychological factors, most of which are included in health behavior theories. This systematic review compared different health behavior theories in terms of their capacity to explain CCS uptake and inform CCS promotion campaigns.
Methods: A comprehensive search and analysis of published intervention and nonintervention (observational) studies that applied at least one health behavior theory to CCS participation. Results: After quality screening, 48 observational and 21 intervention studies were identified that applied the Health Belief Model (HBM), Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), Transtheoretical model (TTM), Socialecological Model (SEM), and/or Theory of Triadic Influence (TTI) to CCS. The HBM was most frequently used to explain behavior, whereas the TPB was better at explaining screening intentions. Tailored intervention studies focusing on all theoretical constructs were most effective in modifying perceptions and increasing CCS uptake. Conclusions: Despite their inconsistent use, health behavior theories can explain CCS intentions and behavior and contribute to the development of targeted interventions to promote screening uptake. K E Y W O R D S beliefs, cancer, health behavior theories, health behaviors, interventions, public health nursing education, screening, women's health 1 BACKGROUND Cancer of the cervix uteri is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide, and accounts for 7.5% of all female cancer deaths (Ferlay et al., 2015). The projected number of deaths due to cervical cancer by 2030 is estimated at approximately 80%, with the highest mortality occurring in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). While vaccination is increasingly practiced in economically developed countries, most LMICs restrict cancer prevention to screening. Screening helps to detect and treat infections that may progress into cancer at an early stage, which results in a better prognosis and higher survival rate (Edge & Compton, 2010). Yet, despite the wide availability of screening, the participation of women in CCS programs is often suboptimal, especially in LMICs (Islam et al., 2017).