2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8070474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the Accuracy and Automation of Fractional Vegetation Cover Estimation from Digital Photographs

Abstract: Abstract:The use of automated methods to estimate fractional vegetation cover (FVC) from digital photographs has increased in recent years given its potential to produce accurate, fast and inexpensive FVC measurements. Wide acceptance has been delayed because of the limitations in accuracy, speed, automation and generalization of these methods. This work introduces a novel technique, the Automated Canopy Estimator (ACE) that overcomes many of these challenges to produce accurate estimates of fractional vegetat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In overgrowth, all pixels corresponding to leaves, stems, and branches were classified as cover, and the rest of the pixels were classified as sky. As mentioned in [11], visual classification is considered as the real values of cover in the image and those are compared with the automated threshold proposed in this research.…”
Section: Accuracy In Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In overgrowth, all pixels corresponding to leaves, stems, and branches were classified as cover, and the rest of the pixels were classified as sky. As mentioned in [11], visual classification is considered as the real values of cover in the image and those are compared with the automated threshold proposed in this research.…”
Section: Accuracy In Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plots represented different land uses. The accuracy of the implemented classifier (AC) was evaluated using the following formula [11].…”
Section: Accuracy In Cover Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the assumption of LSU methods for decomposition of endmembers in mixed pixels is often not true because of multiple scattering from neighboring objects and interactions among the endmembers [19,20]. Moreover, decomposition of endmembers in mixed pixels is complex and depends on many factors, including landscape complexity, spatial resolution of images, purity of endmembers, or training samples selected and relationship of PVC with spectral variables derived from images [5,6,9,11,17,19,20]. Therefore, LSU methods do not work well in many cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%