2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06)
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2006.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental learning of object detectors using a visual shape alphabet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the RP AUC measure, we get higher results than [22] in 5 of the 7 classes. Under the RP EER measure, we also get higher results than [18] in 5 of the 7 classes.…”
Section: Graz 17 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Under the RP AUC measure, we get higher results than [22] in 5 of the 7 classes. Under the RP EER measure, we also get higher results than [18] in 5 of the 7 classes.…”
Section: Graz 17 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…FC is also suitable to describe objects when only the bounding boxes of objects are given in training. Using sliding window strategy, FC can outperform more sophisticated object detectors [22,18,21], which is a nontrivial accomplishment. In the future, we would like to combine FC method with the interest region detectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We chose to tackle the problem by recognizing a 3D object through a set of 2D images each corresponding to a single viewpoint. In the state of the art, we can find a great variety of 2D object recognition methods, some successful methods are those of Lowe [11], Belongie et al [2], Furgus et al [5], Shotton et al [14], Opelt et al [12]. However, most of these methods work only on textured objects and fail on smooth shapes, such as sketch images (drawings).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%