2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.09435
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental Learning Techniques for Online Human Activity Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also concluded that the classification times were also dependent on the device models and capabilities. Similarly, Meysam, Vakili et al [25] proposed a real-time HAR model for online prediction of human physical movements based on the smartphone inertial sensors. A total of 20 different activities were selected, and six incremental learning algorithms were used to check the performance of the system, then all of them were also compared with the state-of-the-art HAR algorithms such as Decision Trees (DTs), AdaBoost, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also concluded that the classification times were also dependent on the device models and capabilities. Similarly, Meysam, Vakili et al [25] proposed a real-time HAR model for online prediction of human physical movements based on the smartphone inertial sensors. A total of 20 different activities were selected, and six incremental learning algorithms were used to check the performance of the system, then all of them were also compared with the state-of-the-art HAR algorithms such as Decision Trees (DTs), AdaBoost, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bagging method was used in this study to improve the classification performance of a single tree. Different numbers of decision trees of RF were used in the training process {5, 10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45, 50} to see how many decision trees were required to achieve the best results. After comparing all the results from all the activities, an RF with a 30-decision-tree classifier gave the best accuracy among all.…”
Section: Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it was determined that the duration of categorization was contingent upon the specific device types and their respective capabilities. In the same direction, authors [22], worked on a realtime human activity recognition (HAR) model that enables the live prediction of physical motions using inertial sensors embedded in smartphones. A selection of 20 distinct activities was made, its efficiency was evaluated using six incremental learning algorithms.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shahraki et al [50] investigated and compared the online techniques in the networking domain, highlighting the advantages of online learning and the challenges associated with online-based network traffic stream analysis. Vakili and Rezaei [51] analyzed the performance of online incremental algorithms applied to the real-time prediction of human physical movements using a human activity recognition (HAR) approach. They show that as the style of activities made by a person typically changes, the patterns of performing activities vary from person to person, with the incremental methods attaining consistently better performance than the offline batch ones.…”
Section: E Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%