Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR 1992
DOI: 10.1145/133160.133169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental relevance feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been significant research on text-based profile construction in information retrieval community (e.g., [5,1,7,3]), especially in the framework of TREC [24]. The main emphasis of TREC, however, has always been on the effectiveness of the participating systems, rather than on their efficiency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been significant research on text-based profile construction in information retrieval community (e.g., [5,1,7,3]), especially in the framework of TREC [24]. The main emphasis of TREC, however, has always been on the effectiveness of the participating systems, rather than on their efficiency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that searchers tend to examine a ranked list from top to bottom [10] we feel that this approximation is reasonable. In order to simulate an environment in which users can make mistakes in their relevance judgments, our approach is to build a pool of perceived relevant documents, where this pool consists of non-relevant documents (according to the TREC qrels) that were saved by at least two real users during the original TREC experiments from which we extracted our simulation data.…”
Section: Dynamic Relevance Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of the experiments reported in this chapter, our SCIR simulations operate by initiating a relevance feedback operation for a user each time they provide a relevance judgment, thereby returning a new ranked list of documents to the user. This approach is known as Incremental Relevance Feedback, a method first proposed by Aalbersberg (1992). Using the Incremental RF approach, a user is provided with a new ranked list of documents after each relevance judgment, rather than accumulating a series of relevance judgments together and issuing them in batch to the RF process.…”
Section: Requirements Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%