In 2005, Nikolaou et al.[1] published a paper in European Radiology about the assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detectorrow computed tomography. The authors reported promising results, however, concluded carefully: "… application of delayed enhancement techniques might be useful. … However, this procedure requires a second delayed CT scan, increasing the radiation exposure of the patient."I remember the first scientific presentations about cardiac perfusion imaging and delayed enhancement using computed tomography-it was interesting, but the scientific community considered this topic more or less a scientific gimmick rather than serious work with clinical relevance. Now, in 2011, Alkadhi et al.[2] publish in European Radiology a paper entitled "Delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial viability: Low-dose high-pitch CT versus MRI." The authors included 24 patients and could show that by using the newest generation CT equipment, delayed enhancement by CT has become a reality at a ultra-low radiation dose in submillisievert range, and is now ready for clinical use: The estimated mean radiation dose was as low as 0.89±0.07 mSv (range: 0.74-1.02 mSv). This low radiation dose was obtained by using the "high-pitch" spiral CT technique with a pitch factor of 3.4 and prospective ECG-synchronization; furthermore a 100 kV tube voltage was applied for the delayed enhancement CT data acquisition, making use of the higher attenuation of iodine at lower photon energies. In the present study, the authors perform a standard contrast-enhanced CTA using a high-pitch protocol on a commercially available 128-slice, dual-source CT system after the administration of 70 ml iodinated contrast media. In order to achieve an adequate dose of iodine, 5 min after the first CT data-acquisition, a second dose of 70 ml of iodinated contrast media was administered and, after a total delay of around 15 min from the first injection, a second high-pitch delayed enhancement CT data-set was obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of non-viability were 90.0%, 92.9%, and 91.7% per patient and 60.7%, 96.8% and 94.4% per segment, respectively, with MRI serving as the gold standard.What happened in the last 6 years to make the vision of myocardial viability imaging a reality?In my opinion, new technical developments such as lowdose gating techniques, prospective ECG-triggering and high-pitch CT are all responsible for this present step forward in cardiac imaging. The Cardiac Imaging 'hype' started with the introduction of 64-slice CT with a revolution in image quality. This first wave of excitement was followed by a disillusion: the radiation dose of cardiac CT reached values of 12-14 mSv, even higher than the radiation dose values of a conventional invasive angiography. However with the introduction of newer CT equipment with 128-, 256-, and 320-slices, as well as dual source CT-machines, faster CT protocols with radically lower radiation dose have become possible. In ...