2015
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-090x2015000200001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incumbency Advantage and Tenure Length in the Chilean Chamber of Deputies, 1989-2009

Abstract: Artículos CienCia PolítiCa Incumbency AdvAntAge And tenure Length In the chILeAn chAmber of deputIes, 1989-2009* 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
3
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The gender gap in running and winning—which was statistically significant for all race types except running for municipal councils—is not surprising, given women’s overall underrepresentation in electoral politics (Supplementary Appendix 2). 6 Based on these trends, and building upon previous research finding no evidence that the number of deputies’ previous terms affected whether deputies sought or won reelection (Bunker & Navia, 2015), we treat running and winning as binary variables. We anticipate that incumbency will provide the strongest experience cue, but started with a broader analysis, placing candidates into three mutually exclusive groups based on past political experience: those who never ran for any elected office before (“never-rans”); those who ran but always lost (“perpetual losers”); and those who won any office at least once (“previous winners”).…”
Section: The Gender Gap In Campaign Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gender gap in running and winning—which was statistically significant for all race types except running for municipal councils—is not surprising, given women’s overall underrepresentation in electoral politics (Supplementary Appendix 2). 6 Based on these trends, and building upon previous research finding no evidence that the number of deputies’ previous terms affected whether deputies sought or won reelection (Bunker & Navia, 2015), we treat running and winning as binary variables. We anticipate that incumbency will provide the strongest experience cue, but started with a broader analysis, placing candidates into three mutually exclusive groups based on past political experience: those who never ran for any elected office before (“never-rans”); those who ran but always lost (“perpetual losers”); and those who won any office at least once (“previous winners”).…”
Section: The Gender Gap In Campaign Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para el periodo de estudio, la Cámara de Diputados de Chile se conformó de ciento veinte diputados distribuidos en sesenta distritos y electos por cuatro años. El sistema electoral utilizado durante este periodo fue el sistema binominal, el cual elegía para cada distrito dos diputados correspondientes a las dos primeras mayorías 4 , lo que tendía a la elección de un representante por coalición (Bunker y Navia, 2015;Carey, 2006). Además, este sistema proporcionó para el caso del Congreso chileno una comparabilidad de los actores en el tiempo debido a la indefinida posibilidad de reelección, lo que causó tasas de incumbencia cercanas al 60 % (González-Bustamante y Cisternas, 2016).…”
Section: Unidad De Análisis E Hipótesisunclassified
“…Si bien cambió de nombre durante algunos periodos e incluyó otros partidos, su reconocimiento electoral ha sido mayoritariamente por sus dos partidos líderes y el nombre de Alianza por Chile 4 Si una lista duplica en votos a la lista que le sigue obtiene los dos escaños. En caso contrario, las dos listas mayoritarias eligen un diputado cada una (Bunker y Navia, 2015;Carey, 2006). (Luna y Rovira, 2014).…”
Section: Unidad De Análisis E Hipótesisunclassified
“…While the party system traces its origins to the pre-1973 democratic breakdown (Scully, 1992;Valenzuela, 1995), Pinochet's dictatorship shaped it into two main -pro-democracy and pro-authoritarianism-blocs (Tironi & Agüero, 1999;Torcal & Mainwaring, 2003). Not surprisingly, many studies treat Chile as a twoparty system, considering the two multiparty dominant coalitions as single parties, even if for simplicity purposes only (Dow, 1998;Carey, 2002;Siavelis, 2004;Londregan, 2007;Alemán & Saiegh, 2007;Morgenstern, Polga-Hecimovich, & Siavelis, 2014;Bunker & Navia, 2015;Bargsted & Maldonado, 2018;. Although those studies also acknowledge Chilean politics' multiparty nature, they use the stable two-coalition alignment as a shortcut to simplify their analysis, treating Chile as «a de facto two-party system» (Alemán & Saiegh, 2007, p. 253).…”
Section: Alternative Presidential Candidates In Chile 1989-2017mentioning
confidence: 99%