1997
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.141-143.501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indentation, Penetration and Perforation of Composite Laminate and Sandwich Panels under Quasi-Static and Projectile Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
123
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it was observed that the perforation energy increased with inclination angle in Figure 5 (b) which is in agreement with the work by Zhou et al [19]. Referring to an earlier study by Wen et al [21], the dynamic enhancement factor, Φ, which is defined as the ratio of the dynamic perforation energy for a panel to the energy absorbed up the fracture of the lower skin of an identical panel under quasi-static loading was considered. This parameter is shown to increase with inclination angle as listed in Table 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it was observed that the perforation energy increased with inclination angle in Figure 5 (b) which is in agreement with the work by Zhou et al [19]. Referring to an earlier study by Wen et al [21], the dynamic enhancement factor, Φ, which is defined as the ratio of the dynamic perforation energy for a panel to the energy absorbed up the fracture of the lower skin of an identical panel under quasi-static loading was considered. This parameter is shown to increase with inclination angle as listed in Table 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, most of these works are dedicated to ballistic impact [2,20]. Wen et al [21] highlighted three important steps of panel failure during deformation in a sandwich structure; these being (i) initial failure where one of the skins of the panel is fractured with or without considerable deformation of the core; (ii) penetration of the indenter through the thickness of the panel; and (iii) perforation of the panel when the whole of the indenter has emerged through the panel. In addition, there are three different failure modes associated with the initial failure; these being (i) indentation failure; (ii) core shear failure, and (iii) panel bending failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the crushing resistance of the deformed core, that increases during the test with the foam density, does not allow the deformation of the whole structure that would avoid local indentation phenomena [13].…”
Section: Indentation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides a more complex impact response and damage mechanism. Many researchers have investigated the impact response and damage characteristics of sandwich structures [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Low-velocity impact damage on sandwich laminates is confined to the top skin, the core-top skin interface, and the core material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%