Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin

doi:10.31078/jk1823

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Salah dua caranya adalah memastikan bahwa dalam menjalankan tugasnya, organisasi tetap independen dan melakukan pengungkapan baik dari sisi keuangan ataupun kinerja. Namun, KPK yang saat ini masuk ke dalam rumpun eksekutif, independensinya mulai dipertanyakan (Mohtar, 2021).…”

Section: Dimensi Keagenan Dan Kepercayaan Publikunclassified

Analisis Inkonsistensi Antara Kinerja Dengan Kepercayaan Publik Pada Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Rizal

Wondabio

2023

jaa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor inkonsistensi antara capaian kinerja dengan kepercayaan publik atas KPK dan menyusun langkah strategis berdasarkan teori pengukuran kinerja, keagenan, kepercayaan publik dan new public management menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan strategi studi kasus. Capaian kinerja KPK secara keseluruhan sebesar 100,64%. Namun, berdasarkan analisis kualitatif, dari Sasaran Strategis (SS) yang diturunkan ke dalam beberapa Indikator Kinerja Utama (IKU), terdapat beberapa indikator yang tidak tercapai dan didominasi dari perspektif Proses Internal. Selain itu strategi yang ditetapkan oleh KPK tidak memiliki fokus yang jelas, terjadi penggemukan struktur organisasi yang pada akhirnya terlihat tumpang tindih tugas antara Dewan Pengawas dan Inspektorat, independensi KPK yang dipertanyakan, penyampaian informasi internal yang tidak sistematis, lunturnya asas keterbukaan seperti tertutupnya hasil kajian terkait korupsi dan tertutupnya peradilan etik yang dilakukan oleh Dewan Pengawas.

show abstract

Section: Dimensi Keagenan Dan Kepercayaan Publikunclassified

Analisis Inkonsistensi Antara Kinerja Dengan Kepercayaan Publik Pada Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Rizal

Wondabio

2023

jaa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While independent, the Commission has not managed to recruit a comprehensive investigator officer, presenting its unique challenges. Reliance on investigators from other institutions can influence the independence and objectivity of the investigation process, affecting the quality and integrity of the legal process and potentially causing conflicts of interest, which can ultimately impact the Commission's credibility and legitimacy in performing its functions and duties (Mochtar, 2021).…”

Section: Pendahuluanmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Problematics of Determining Investigators for the Corruption Eradication Commission

Imran,

Koswara

2023

sjh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to examine the problems of appointing Commission investigators. This study uses normative legal research with a statute approach. The collected legal material is then qualitatively analyzed to describe the problem and answer the study objectives. The results show that the Commission holds the authority to appoint Civil Servant Investigators from its internal ranks. One of the requirements for such an appointment is that the Commission conducts education and training in the field of investigation in collaboration with the Police. However, the Commission still recruits investigators from the Police and the Attorney General’s Office. Appointing investigators from these two entities presents challenges, including continuity issues in the investigative process, the risk of losing essential information or knowledge about handled cases, and legal and administrative considerations when the tenure of an employed investigator reaches its maximum limit. Therefore, it is recommended that the Commission and relevant stakeholders enhance the capacity and competency of internal Civil Servant Investigators through systematic and continuous education and training, thus reducing dependence on investigators from the Police and the Attorney General’s Office. Furthermore, the Commission should consider formulating strategies to minimize the risk of vital information loss due to investigator turnover, such as creating detailed case documentation and an effective case transition system. Additionally, the Commission can collaborate with relevant legal and administrative entities to address potential legal and administrative issues arising from the conclusion of an investigator’s tenure, considering aspects of justice and thoroughness in the investigative process.

show abstract

“…This signifies that when executing its responsibilities concerning corruption, the KPK should operate with complete freedom and independence, not only from interventions by other agencies but also from other state officials. [2] However, due to the subsequent amendment of Law Number 30 of 2002 on on The Corruption Eradication Commission, as modified by Law Number 19 of 2019 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission (referred to as the Law on KPK), the formerly independent state agency, the KPK, has undergone a decline in its status. This degradation is evident through the revised Article 3 of the Law on KPK, placing the KPK under the umbrella of the executive branch of power.…”

Section: Legal Implications Of the Kpk Independence Following Constit...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Efforts to weaken the KPK include the revision of the Law on KPK, which fundamentally alters its structural organization, as well as the ambiguity in the position of the KPK within the executive branch. [2] The most recent effort that continues to undermine the independence of the KPK is the decision made by the Constitutional Court (MK) in Case Number 112/PUU-XX/2022, which extends the term of the KPK chairman from 4 to 5 years. This decision has garnered significant public attention since, instead of being applied for future terms (prospectively), it has been implemented retroactively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Questioning the Independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and Judicial Restraint

Nursetiawan,

Ardhanariswari,

Fauzan

et al. 2023

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), an independent state institution, continues to face threats. The extension of the term of office of the current KPK chairman through the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) Number 112/PUU-XX/2022 is not based on the principle of universal law, namely, the principle of non-retroactivity. This study aims to examine two problems: the legal implications for the independence of the KPK after the Constitutional Court's decision and the judicial restraint on the position of the Constitutional Court in extending the term of office of the KPK leadership. This study used normative legal research with a statutory approach. The results of this study showed that the degree or degradation of KPK independence is increasingly evident. The extension of the term of office through a retroactive Constitutional Court decision violated the universal principle of law. The extension of the term of office of the current KPK chairman has no urgency because they still have the opportunity to be re-elected in the next period.

show abstract

Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Analisis Inkonsistensi Antara Kinerja Dengan Kepercayaan Publik Pada Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Analisis Inkonsistensi Antara Kinerja Dengan Kepercayaan Publik Pada Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

The Problematics of Determining Investigators for the Corruption Eradication Commission

Questioning the Independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and Judicial Restraint

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About