1989
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90002-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Independent effects of morphine and apomorphine on stereotyped gnawing in the hamster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings that supported Siegel’s (1975) observations and conclusions concerning the role of conditioning in the development of analgesia to morphine were later reported using different species (e.g., Kavaliers & Hirst, 1983; Schnur & Martinez, 1989), as well as diverse controls and test conditions (Siegel, 1976; Siegel et al, 1978; Tiffany & Baker, 1981). For example, support was found using conditional discriminations with different contextual cues serving as CSs with two different tests (hot plate and analgesiometer [for test description, see Table 1]; Siegel, 1976), using an unpaired contextual cue/morphine injection control and subsequent hot plate test (Siegel et al, 1978), and using a flinch/jump assessment of analgesia (Tiffany & Baker, 1981; for test description, see Table 1).…”
Section: Audiovisual and Contextual Cues Morphine And Conditionesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Findings that supported Siegel’s (1975) observations and conclusions concerning the role of conditioning in the development of analgesia to morphine were later reported using different species (e.g., Kavaliers & Hirst, 1983; Schnur & Martinez, 1989), as well as diverse controls and test conditions (Siegel, 1976; Siegel et al, 1978; Tiffany & Baker, 1981). For example, support was found using conditional discriminations with different contextual cues serving as CSs with two different tests (hot plate and analgesiometer [for test description, see Table 1]; Siegel, 1976), using an unpaired contextual cue/morphine injection control and subsequent hot plate test (Siegel et al, 1978), and using a flinch/jump assessment of analgesia (Tiffany & Baker, 1981; for test description, see Table 1).…”
Section: Audiovisual and Contextual Cues Morphine And Conditionesupporting
confidence: 57%