2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indeterminacy in a two-sector endogenous growth model with productive government spending

Abstract: We extend the Barro (1990) model of endogenous growth to a two-sector one which consists of pure consumption and investment goods. It is possible that the extended version has a unique balanced growth rate such that for given initial values of state variables, (i) the extended model economy grows at the unique rate right from the beginning or (ii) it has a continuum of equilibrium paths whose growth rates commonly converge to the balanced growth rate. That is, unlike the original one-sector model, it has trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we analytically show that the relationship between indeterminacy and 1 See, for example, Jones and Manuelli (1990), King and Rebelo (1990), Rebelo (1991), Pecorino (1993), Hendricks (2001), Song (2002), and Jonsson (2007). Existing studies that consider constant income taxation and useful public expenditures include Barro (1990), Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1992), Futagami, Morita, and Shibata (1993), Ravikumar (1994, 1997), Cazzavillan (1996), Turnovsky (1996Turnovsky ( , 1997Turnovsky ( , 1999, Zhang (2000), Baier and Glomm (2001), Palivos, Yip, and Zhang (2003), Chen (2006), Greiner (2007), and Hu, Ohdoi, and Shimomura (2008), among others. 2 Yamarik (2001) analyzes the distortionary growth implications of a non-linear tax schedule in a one-sector AK model of endogenous growth with useless government spending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In particular, we analytically show that the relationship between indeterminacy and 1 See, for example, Jones and Manuelli (1990), King and Rebelo (1990), Rebelo (1991), Pecorino (1993), Hendricks (2001), Song (2002), and Jonsson (2007). Existing studies that consider constant income taxation and useful public expenditures include Barro (1990), Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1992), Futagami, Morita, and Shibata (1993), Ravikumar (1994, 1997), Cazzavillan (1996), Turnovsky (1996Turnovsky ( , 1997Turnovsky ( , 1999, Zhang (2000), Baier and Glomm (2001), Palivos, Yip, and Zhang (2003), Chen (2006), Greiner (2007), and Hu, Ohdoi, and Shimomura (2008), among others. 2 Yamarik (2001) analyzes the distortionary growth implications of a non-linear tax schedule in a one-sector AK model of endogenous growth with useless government spending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“… See the works of Dasgupta (1999, 2001), Chen (2006), Tsoukis and Miller (2003), Chang (1999), Turnovsky (1997, 1996), Hu, Ohdoi, and Shimomura (2008), Ohdoi (2007), Greiner and Semmler (2000), Kalaitzidakis and Kalyvitis (2004), Baier and Glomm (2001), Yakita (2004), Shioji (2001), Tamai (2007), Burguet and Fernandez‐Ruiz (1998), Ghosh and Mourmouras (2002), Raurich‐Puigdevall (2000), Cazzavillan (1996), Zhang (2000), Neill (1996), Mourmouras and Lee (1999), Park and Philippopoulos (2002), Tanaka (2002), Chen and Lee (2007), etc. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important issue this paper addresses is how government's spending affects economic growth, trade pattern, and wealth and income distributions (Barro, 1990;Turnovsky, 2000Turnovsky, , 2004. We are especially concerned with progressive income taxation (e.g., Glomm and Ravikumar, 1997;Agénor, 2011;Baier and Glomm, 2001;Palivos et al, 2003;Greiner, 2007;Hu et al, 2008;andGuo, 2013, 2014). This paper deviates from traditional approaches by applying Zhang's concept of disposable income and utility function (Zhang, 1993(Zhang, , 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%