2016
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Index of tobacco control sustainability (ITCS): a tool to measure the sustainability of national tobacco control programmes

Abstract: The 31 indicators were agreed to be 'critical' or 'important' factors for tobacco control sustainability. The Index comprises the weighted indicators as a tool to identify aspects of national tobacco control programmes requiring further development to augment their sustainability and to measure and compare progress over time. The next step is to apply the ITCS and produce tobacco control sustainability assessments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussion was a part of global initiative of The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease called The Index of Tobacco Control Sustainability (ITCS). ITCS is a tool to assess and guide national tobacco control programs to become more sustainable [11]. The open discussion was structured by 31 indicators that have a critical influence on the national capacity to deliver effective and sustainable tobacco control into the future.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion was a part of global initiative of The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease called The Index of Tobacco Control Sustainability (ITCS). ITCS is a tool to assess and guide national tobacco control programs to become more sustainable [11]. The open discussion was structured by 31 indicators that have a critical influence on the national capacity to deliver effective and sustainable tobacco control into the future.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 92 sourced papers, 31 were excluded because they did not meet the above criteria. The exclusions included review papers (n = 8); indexes concerned with tobacco and prescription drugs (n = 6) (Heydari et al, ; Heydari, Talischi, Algouhmani, Lando, & Ahmady, ; Heydari, Ebn Ahmady, Lando, Shadmehr, & Fadaizadeh, ; Jackson‐Morris & Latif, ; Joossens & Raw, ; van Amsterdam, Phillips, et al, ) or policies other than alcohol or drugs directly (n = 3) (Meylakhs, ; Watson, Orwat, Wagner, Shuman, & Tolliver, ); eight papers that concerned aggregation but not across multidimensional domains (e.g., Fell, Fisher, Voas, Blackman, & Tippetts, ; Lachenmeier & Rehm, ), or where the indicators were not combined into a single index (Jourdan, ; Ritter, ); and two which were incomplete. Two papers which on the surface appeared to be Treatment Need indexes, fell more accurately into prevalence estimation using social indicators (Herman‐Stahl et al, ; McRae, Beebe, & Harrison, ), along with a paper which focused on estimating individual need for treatment (Shepard et al, ) and treatment center readiness (Minugh, Janke, Lomuto, & Galloway, ), which were thus also excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 When compared with other countries in Southeast Asia on levels of implementation and the likely sustainability of tobacco control activities, Thailand has ranked very high. 7,8 However, as a middle-income country, Thailand still faces limitations of fiscal and human resources for tobacco control and must devise methods to set and assess implementation goals important to fulfilling its FCTC responsibilities and domestic aims for effective and efficient tobacco control activities. In considering these responsibilities, the Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center (TRC), a research unit based at Mahidol University, Bangkok, has chosen to use stakeholder input to identify the gaps and needs for gains in tobacco control implementation of specific FCTC articles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%