“…From the 92 sourced papers, 31 were excluded because they did not meet the above criteria. The exclusions included review papers (n = 8); indexes concerned with tobacco and prescription drugs (n = 6) (Heydari et al, ; Heydari, Talischi, Algouhmani, Lando, & Ahmady, ; Heydari, Ebn Ahmady, Lando, Shadmehr, & Fadaizadeh, ; Jackson‐Morris & Latif, ; Joossens & Raw, ; van Amsterdam, Phillips, et al, ) or policies other than alcohol or drugs directly (n = 3) (Meylakhs, ; Watson, Orwat, Wagner, Shuman, & Tolliver, ); eight papers that concerned aggregation but not across multidimensional domains (e.g., Fell, Fisher, Voas, Blackman, & Tippetts, ; Lachenmeier & Rehm, ), or where the indicators were not combined into a single index (Jourdan, ; Ritter, ); and two which were incomplete. Two papers which on the surface appeared to be Treatment Need indexes, fell more accurately into prevalence estimation using social indicators (Herman‐Stahl et al, ; McRae, Beebe, & Harrison, ), along with a paper which focused on estimating individual need for treatment (Shepard et al, ) and treatment center readiness (Minugh, Janke, Lomuto, & Galloway, ), which were thus also excluded.…”