Stories of personal experience have been a staple of research on narrative, while stories of vicarious experience have remained largely ignored, though they offer special insights into issues of epistemic authority and telling rights, coherence and evaluation, contextualization and stance-taking. This article investigates the largely unexplored matters of why conversationalists tell stories about other people, how they establish their authority to tell these stories, how they relate these stories to their current conversational context, and how they participant design these stories and shape them for purposes of identity construction in interaction. Speeches by Barack Obama provide a rich resource for investigating narratives of vicarious experience, illustrating a wide range of forms contextualized in complex ways, and told for a variety of purposes.Most research on conversational storytelling concerns stories of personal experience, precisely because most stories in conversation are about the tellers themselves. Nevertheless, conversationalists sometimes do tell stories about other people, sometimes people they do not know, engaged in actions those tellers did not witness. Such narratives of vicarious experience are rendered in the third person (he, she, they) by contrast with the first person I characteristic of stories of personal experience. It is the purpose of this article to investigate how such stories work, how tellers establish their right to tell such stories and how these stories ultimately accrue to their personal identity based on speeches by Barack Obama.The definition of narrative by Labov and Waletzky (1967, p. 20) as "one method of recapitulating past experience by matching a verbal sequence of clauses to Requests for further information should be directed to: Neal R. Norrick,