India's Slow Emergence as a Regional Security Actor

Tarapore, Arzan

doi:10.1080/0163660x.2017.1328931

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although successive governments have endorsed the Look/Act East policy, the priority for both time and resources is necessarily given to the unresolved territorial disputes on India's land borders with Pakistan and China. 53 Within the country, armed violence in the northeast and Kashmir has at times proven to be beyond the ability of local police to contain. 54 To guard against Pakistani revisionism and Chinese adventurism, as well as support local authorities in domestic contingencies, India is compelled to retain a large conventional army that absorbs 55% of the country's defense spending.…”

Section: Limits To Cooperationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sailing Together or Ships Passing in the Night? India and the United States in Southeast Asia

Ladwig¹,

Mukherjee²

2019

Asia Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Limits To Cooperationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sailing Together or Ships Passing in the Night? India and the United States in Southeast Asia

Ladwig¹,

Mukherjee²

2019

Asia Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…U pitanju je delimično generacijski problem, jer su formativne godine indijskih starijih intelektualaca i vladinih službenika bile 1970-te i 1980-te, koje su bile definisane antiamerikanizmom. 34 Sa druge strane, prema drugim procenama američkog porekla, indijski narod je manje sumnjičav prema Kini, za razliku od javnog mnjenja SAD ili njihovih saveznika, što se održava i na stav indijske strateške elite koja, navodno, preferira ekvidistancu u slučaju intenziviranja američko-kineskog nadmetanja. 35 I Ešli Telis navodi kako su u Indiji podsticaji za strateško partnerstvo sa Sjedinjenim Državama uvek dolazili više zahvaljujući viziji i ličnosti lidera (Vadžpajia, Singa, Modija), nego li osećaju potrebe u širokim masama.…”

unclassified

Perspektive američko-indijskog savezništva u svetlu „kineske pretnje”

Vuković¹

2020

Međunarodna politika

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

perspektive američko-indijskog savezništva u svetlu ,,kineske pretnje" SAŽETAK U radu se kritički analizira i procenjuje mogućnost da tokom naredne decenije (2020-2030) Sjedinjene Američke Države i Indija sklope ugovor o vojnom savezništvu (analogno, na primer, sporazumima koje SAD imaju sa Australijom ili Japanom) i tako trenutni partnerski odnos podignu na kvalitativno viši nivo. Kao primarni motiv za takav eventualni aranžman, autor navodi kontinuiranu ekonomsku ekspanziju, ali i vojno jačanje NR Kine (uz njeno sve veće prisustvo na okeanima), koju obe zemlje-Indija i SAD-percipiraju kao potencijalnu bezbednosnu pretnju i mogućeg agresora. Autor nabraja i obrazlaže najvažnije činioce koji govore u prilog formiranju takvog savezništva, ali i one faktore koji bi mogli da utiču na to da se takav aranžman ne realizuje. Osnovnu tezu autora čini stav da su šanse za formiranje američko-indijskog vojnog savezništva tokom predstojeće decenije vrlo umerene, zbog niza okolnosti (ograničenja) koje se odnose, pre svega, na Indiju.

show abstract

Contesting Roles: Rising Powers as “Net Providers of Security”

Fung

Lam

2020

Journal of Global Security Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What is a “net provider of security,” or a “global security provider”? How are such roles adopted by rising powers? We define a net provider of security as a social role, when an actor provides novel, niche, and functionally differentiated security duties, supporting burden-sharing in providing public goods. The nascent literature on these US-vectored roles characterizes role adoption as largely successful. However, rising powers contest the US-designated net provider of security role. Rising powers have stated or latent foreign policy goals to shape international order in their strategic vision, reflecting ideational capacity to reconceptualize their role in global politics, or a material capacity to reposition their rank. Building upon insights from role theory, we illustrate that rising powers exploit temporal and rhetorical ambiguities and leverage their material and ideational resources to execute role differentiation through three micro-processes of role resistance—role acknowledgment, role task rejection, and role task substitution—used to promote an idiosyncratic role, casting the US-vectored role as non-functional, non-representational, and untenable. We examine crucial cases of rising powers, India and China, to develop our theoretical contribution. Our findings speak to the literatures on the logic of identity management, rhetoric in international politics, the taxonomy of contemporary ad hoc security arrangements, and the epistemological project of globalizing international relations.

show abstract

India's Slow Emergence as a Regional Security Actor

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Sailing Together or Ships Passing in the Night? India and the United States in Southeast Asia

Sailing Together or Ships Passing in the Night? India and the United States in Southeast Asia

Perspektive američko-indijskog savezništva u svetlu „kineske pretnje”

Contesting Roles: Rising Powers as “Net Providers of Security”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About