2019
DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicators as Substitute for Policy Contestation and Accountability? Some Reflections on the 2030 Agenda from the Perspective of Gender Equality and Women's Rights

Abstract: Thanks to successful strategizing by women's rights organizations, attention to gender equality and women's rights is remarkably wide‐ranging in the 2030 Agenda. But the ambition to have gender equality as a crosscutting issue tends to evaporate at the level of targets and indicators. This speaks to the difficulties of using quantitative indicators to capture the largely context‐specific and qualitative dimensions of gender equality. Ultimately, some of the concerns about the huge significance attached to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly the case for gender-based analyses and policy-making. As Razavi [7] notes "In the end, while six of the 17 goals include gender-specific indicators, the indicator framework under five of the goals can be described as 'gender-sparse' (Goals 2, 10, 11, 13 and 17) and for the remaining six critical areas it is depressingly 'gender-blind' (Goals 6, 7, 9, 12, 14 and 15) [8]." The reasons for this apparent gender neglect are many and diverse but one of the simplest explanations is that gender as a category of analysis is difficult to constrain in simple indicator-based systems, more so for systemic issues like climate change urban planning and transport.…”
Section: Women Development and Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly the case for gender-based analyses and policy-making. As Razavi [7] notes "In the end, while six of the 17 goals include gender-specific indicators, the indicator framework under five of the goals can be described as 'gender-sparse' (Goals 2, 10, 11, 13 and 17) and for the remaining six critical areas it is depressingly 'gender-blind' (Goals 6, 7, 9, 12, 14 and 15) [8]." The reasons for this apparent gender neglect are many and diverse but one of the simplest explanations is that gender as a category of analysis is difficult to constrain in simple indicator-based systems, more so for systemic issues like climate change urban planning and transport.…”
Section: Women Development and Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research has established a clear link between urban areas and gender equality (Anyanwu & Augustine, 2013 ; Susan Solomon et al, 2021 ). Voice and accountability index is taken from the World Bank’s Governance Indicators (Meisenberg & Woodley, 2015 ; Razavi, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite many constraints, the SDG GIF was assembled in record time. Nevertheless, critics of the SDG indicators have criticised them for being reductionist and of watering down the ambition of the goals and targets (Fukuda-Parr and McNeill 2019;Engle Merry 2019;Razavi 2019). Yet statistics are by definition reductionist.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%