2013
DOI: 10.1787/5k47t9q2t923-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicators for Measuring Competitiveness in Tourism

Abstract: This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
73
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The most acceptable definition of destination competitiveness is defined by Dwyer and Kim (2003) and adopted by many researchers (e.g. Dupeyras & MacCallum, 2013;Goffi, 2013;Marku, 2014;Komppula, 2014;Omerzel, 2006), who explained the meaning of destination competitiveness as a critical component that appears to be linked to the destination's ability in delivering goods and services superior than other destinations and the goods and services were evaluated as important tourism experiences by tourists. Destination competitiveness is also defined by Hassan (2000) as the ability of a destination to maintain its market position relative to competitors by creating value added products and integrating all productivity levels of various components of tourism industry to sustain its resources.…”
Section: Tourism Destination Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most acceptable definition of destination competitiveness is defined by Dwyer and Kim (2003) and adopted by many researchers (e.g. Dupeyras & MacCallum, 2013;Goffi, 2013;Marku, 2014;Komppula, 2014;Omerzel, 2006), who explained the meaning of destination competitiveness as a critical component that appears to be linked to the destination's ability in delivering goods and services superior than other destinations and the goods and services were evaluated as important tourism experiences by tourists. Destination competitiveness is also defined by Hassan (2000) as the ability of a destination to maintain its market position relative to competitors by creating value added products and integrating all productivity levels of various components of tourism industry to sustain its resources.…”
Section: Tourism Destination Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the two reviews of the TLGH that exist provide (a) a literature overview of the economic framework underlying the TLGH (Brida et al, 2016) and (b) a chronological analysis of the empirical research (del Pabloromero & Molina, 2013), they do not focus on identifying the reasons why some countries can use tourism as a successful growth strategy while others cannot. The work by Jonker, Heath, and Du Toit (2004) and Dupeyras and MacCallum (2013) are therefore key inputs in identifying the various CSFs for growth of a competitive tourism industry, and each of the CSFs are subsequently reviewed:…”
Section: Csfs For Tourism Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dwyer and Kim (2003) indicate that natural attractions of a destination together with the environmental framework can used to reflect whether tourists enjoy the destination or otherwise. Dupeyras and MacCallum (2013) indicate that a successful tourism destination has the ability to provide unique experiences to tourists which includes natural resources. Moreover, destinations with recognised world heritage status have the competitive advantage over other destination to attract tourists.…”
Section: Natural Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%