Indigenous rights at a crossroads: Territorial struggles, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and legal geographies of liminality

Correia, Joel E.

doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.013

Cited by 28 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This would yield a strong foundation for the assertion of territorial claims, essential to effective resistance. 101 Keeping their lands intact at the present time does not mean that the Munduruku, and Amazonia's indigenous peoples more generally, will choose to protect the region's environment over the long run, especially if the Brazilian government provides a judicious sharing of resource and development royalties. 102 This is to say that conservation may not always be in their best interests.…”

Section: One Earthmentioning

confidence: 99%

Avoiding Amazonian Catastrophes: Prospects for Conservation in the 21st Century

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: One Earthmentioning

confidence: 99%

Avoiding Amazonian Catastrophes: Prospects for Conservation in the 21st Century

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Sehubungan itu, undang-undang sememangnya penting memberi jaminan hak untuk memulihara tanah adat dan juga mempertahankan orang Asli dari semua aspek kehidupan (Correia, 2018). Bagi Orang Asli, dengan adanya undang-undang mereka boleh memperjuangkan hak-hak keadilan sosial dan politik komuniti mereka.…”

Section: Undang-undangunclassified

Tanah Komunal Alternatif Memiliki Tanah dalam Komuniti Orang Asli

Wahab

Manaf

2022

MJSSH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tanah sebagai satu sumber terpenting memberi kesejahteraan komuniti orang Asli dalam kehidupan seharian. Sejauhmana tanah masyarakat orang Asli boleh dilindungi? Kajian ini mengenal pasti domain tanah komunal yang diperlukan dalam mengintegrasikan pemberimilikan tanah secara komunal. Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah pengumpulan data kualitatif melalui pendekatan in-depth interview bersama tiga (3) orang informan yang berpengalaman dalam bidang pentadbiran tanah serta isu tanah orang Asli. Kaedah ini digunakan untuk mendapatkan konsensus dan kesepakatan pakar dalam mengintegrasikan pemilikan tanah melalui kaedah geran komunal. Dapatan sorotan literatur mendapati terdapat lima (5) domain tanah komunal iaitu identiti, sosial, governan, kesejahteraan komuniti, dan hak asasi orang Asli. In-depth interview dengan informan mendapati tanah komunal sangat perlu bagi menjamin social conventions, dan daya tahan sosial (social resilience) masyarakat orang Asli terhadap tanah. Di samping melindungi fleksibiliti komuniti terhadap perubahan sosial yang berlaku ke atas tanah. Implikasi daripada kajian ini boleh membantu pihak agensi untuk membangunkan model hak milik tanah bergeran komunal yang komprehensif bagi masyarakat orang Asli agar hak orang Asli terhadap tanah boleh dilindungi.

show abstract

“…Further complications stem from divergent goals of different groups ostensibly oriented toward justice that may be in tension or outright conflict with one another (Anthias, 2018). While the yerba‐mate collective works for food justice and a peasant production system independent of agribusiness influence, they seek stability on lands from which Indigenous peoples have been dispossessed (Correia, 2018). While Paraguay's peasantry lives at the margins of economic and political participation (Ezquerro‐Cañete, 2016), Indigenous communities face this alongside their violent removal from the land in the establishment of the Paraguayan state, including through the mobilization of the peasantry through land policies (Correia, 2019).…”

Section: Solidarity and Evolving Research Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Solidarity for whom? Interrogating solidarity in geographic research methodologies

Gagliano

2021

Geography Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Calls for researchers to be in solidarity with research participants in hopes of reducing the exploitative research practices inherited through centuries of extractive methods have become the norm in Geography. Participatory research models, diversity in publication forums and types, and redirecting material university resources toward participants have all emerged as ways of altering research methods to practice solidarity with participants. While these are important endeavors, they do not consider solidarity as something which alters the field of research itself. When considering the complexities and limitations of the coalitional possibilities brought forth by solidarity, it becomes apparent that solidarity does not resolve the ethical dilemmas of fieldwork and knowledge production. Experience from field research in Paraguay has demonstrated that practicing solidarity as part of research raises new ethical challenges that alter the multiple encounters that constitute the research process and beyond.

show abstract

Indigenous rights at a crossroads: Territorial struggles, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and legal geographies of liminality

Cited by 28 publications

References 50 publications

Avoiding Amazonian Catastrophes: Prospects for Conservation in the 21st Century

Avoiding Amazonian Catastrophes: Prospects for Conservation in the 21st Century

Tanah Komunal Alternatif Memiliki Tanah dalam Komuniti Orang Asli

Solidarity for whom? Interrogating solidarity in geographic research methodologies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About