2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9905-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous Wellbeing Frameworks in Australia and the Quest for Quantification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These kinds of generalized assessments provide only a narrow understanding of Indigenous well-being (Prout 2011;Kral et al 2011;Parlee et al 2007). Well-being, like the .…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Concepts Of Well-being-what Does It Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These kinds of generalized assessments provide only a narrow understanding of Indigenous well-being (Prout 2011;Kral et al 2011;Parlee et al 2007). Well-being, like the .…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Concepts Of Well-being-what Does It Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics argue that this form of 'postcolonial demography' has largely been geared towards meeting the needs of government rather than the needs of Indigenous peoples and communities (see, for example, Altman 2009; Kukutai and Taylor 2013;Prout 2012;Taylor 2008). By focusing policy interventions solely on individual-level behaviour change rather than underlying power inequalities, contemporary forms of inequality are decoupled from the unequal institutional arrangements that structure the relationship between Indigenous peoples and the State, itself a product of colonialism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative research conducted from the perspective of the dominant culture would still be conducted with the same mind-set as a quantitative researcher from the same culture. The form of data generated would differ but the same issues remain, along with additional issues that arise when having to actively engage with a culturally distinct people at a more intimate level for what is likely to be a much a longer period of time (for data collection) than is required for quantitative research (Prout 2012;Putt 2013). …”
Section: Potential Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%