1975
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/68.4.686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigestibility of C4 Bundle Sheath Cells by the Grasshopper, Melanoplus confusus1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereafter it is evident that the least palatable species proved to be the most dominant in terms of cover. Four of these species are C 4 grasses, supporting studies by Caswell and Reed (1975, 1976) who found that Melanoplus confusus and other species of grasshoppers were capable of digesting C 3 grass material, but were unable to digest totally the thick‐walled bundle sheath cells of C 4 grasses. This is, perhaps, of some relevance when it is considered that the index of palatability successfully predicts relative abundance of the C 3 and C 4 monocots, but is unable to differentiate amongst the dicots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thereafter it is evident that the least palatable species proved to be the most dominant in terms of cover. Four of these species are C 4 grasses, supporting studies by Caswell and Reed (1975, 1976) who found that Melanoplus confusus and other species of grasshoppers were capable of digesting C 3 grass material, but were unable to digest totally the thick‐walled bundle sheath cells of C 4 grasses. This is, perhaps, of some relevance when it is considered that the index of palatability successfully predicts relative abundance of the C 3 and C 4 monocots, but is unable to differentiate amongst the dicots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The C 4 plants not only differ fundamentally from C 3 plants in their photosynthetic pathways but also show marked physiological and anatomical differences (Hatch & Slack, 1970; Raven, Evert & Eichhorn, 1998). The observed avoidance of C 4 plants by some insects in terrestrial systems is suggested to be a consequence of lower nutritional quality (Caswell et al , 1973, Barbehenn & Bernays, 1992), lower nutrient availability (Caswell & Reed, 1975), and physical constraints because of C 4 plant anatomy (Schiers, Bruyn & Verhagen, 2001). In freshwater ecosystems, the chemical and physical characteristics of allochthonous inputs are also known to influence invertebrate palatability and consumption (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that egg and feeding puncture are made between the veins (darker areas running from left to right) Scale bars indicate 150 m. Photo by J. Scheirs. (Caswell et al 1973, Caswell and Reed 1975, 1976, Boutton et al 1980, Heidorn and Joern 1984. Another anatomical difference is a smaller interveinal distance in C 4 plants (Crookston and Moss 1974, Dengler et al 1994, Soros and Dengler 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%