The C 3 -C 4 hypothesis states that plants possessing the C 4 photosynthetic pathway are a poorer food resource for herbivores than those possessing the C 3 pathway, and that this difference is reflected in a tendency for herbivores to avoid feeding on C 4 species. We tested this hypothesis by studying host preference of two oligophagous grass miners, Chromatomyia milii and C. nigra (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Multiple-choice experiments between four C 3 and four C 4 grasses, two-choice experiments between combinations of C 3 and C 4 grasses, and no-choice experiments demonstrated a clear feeding and oviposition preference for C 3 grasses by both miners. Feeding and oviposition were very rare to absent on all C 4 grasses. Nutritional-quality analyses showed that water, protein, amino acid, and lignin content did not differ between C 3 and C 4 grasses; only the soluble carbohydrate content proved to be significantly lower in C 4 grasses.We postulated and tested a new explanation for C 4 avoidance, the ''physical-constraint hypothesis,'' which states that physical constraints imposed by a smaller interveinal distance in C 4 grasses may cause C 4 avoidance. Interveinal distances of C 4 grasses were significantly smaller than those of C 3 grasses, and their ranges did not overlap. Several observations strongly suggested that interveinal distance influences feeding and oviposition patterns. Firstly, the ovipositor and eggs of both miners were too wide to fit between two adjacent veins of C 4 grasses. Secondly, feeding punctures initiated on C 4 grasses were smaller than on C 3 grasses, and feeding-puncture size was correlated with interveinal distance. Regression analysis showed that feeding and oviposition preference were positively related to interveinal distance but not to carbohydrate content. We conclude that our observations are consistent with the physical-constraint hypothesis rather than the nutritional-quality hypothesis.