Indirect Bonding Procedures in Orthodontics - A Review

Aggarwal, Pancham; Aggarwal, Rajni

doi:10.31021/jddm.20181120

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different authors advocated using a double transfer tray in this study to allow the physician to transfer bracket locations to the patient's teeth fast and effectively, and to withdraw the transfer tray after bonding while dislodging brackets. (41,42) .…”

Section: Durate Et Al and Camadrella Te Al Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dependability Of A Digital Indirect Bonding Approach Using E-models And Two Transfer Trays

Eissa

Rifai²,

El-Shal³

et al. 2022

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Orthodontics have been affected by digital technology, including diagnostic tools, treatment planning, appliance production, and 3D printing. To enable bracket arrangement more precisely and effectively, various CAD applications were available. Numerous research that examined the effectiveness and precision of the digital indirect bonding approach discovered that it is, overall, an effective solution. However, there was little investigation on the literatures regarding the external reliability of digital indirect bonding systems. Aim of the study: to assess digitally the amount of variation in bracket locations that occurred during their transfer using an indirect bonding tray within the patient's mouth, as well as the exterior accuracy of the measurements. Materials and methods: Ten patients-four men and six women-with ages ranging from 15.9 to 23.4 years (mean 19.647 years, SD 2.232) had their upper arches' PVS impressions taken, which were then scanned using a lab scanner to create STL files for use in digital models. 100 digital indirect bonds By placing brackets on digital models utilising Ortho Analyzer (3Shape) software, American Orthodontic minimaster braces were applied to the upper arch. After that, a double transfer tray will be built, loaded with braces, and printed in 3D to bond within the patient's mouth. Following that, the CEREC omnicam scanned the bonded brackets. The patient's mouth's bracket position deviations were measured using the Geomagic Control X software. Results: From (-173.1131.65 µm) to (200.2132.86 µm), the total length of the linear measurements. These aberrations, which corresponded to the top right first premolars and upper left canines, respectively, were occlusogingival and in-out in nature. Overall angular readings ranged from 0.51 to 1.94 with a tolerance of 0.03 degrees. These deviations indicated the upper right canines and upper left central incisors, respectively, and were associated to the mesiodistal tip. Discussion: The present study's overall angular differences varied from 0.51° to 1.94° and its overall linear differences ranged from 0.1731 mm to 0.2002 mm; these values coincided with those found in the literature, demonstrating the technique's dependability. Conclusion:The position of brackets on digital models can be accurately replicated by indirect bonding using a dual transfer tray.1 A) candidate in orthodontic department, faculty of dentistry, Minia university (zip code61519), Egypt.B) Assistant lecturer in orthodontics and pedodontics department, Deraya university in Minia, Egypt.

show abstract

Section: Durate Et Al and Camadrella Te Al Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dependability Of A Digital Indirect Bonding Approach Using E-models And Two Transfer Trays

Eissa

Rifai²,

El-Shal³

et al. 2022

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Later, the use of transparent trays (Read and O' Brien 1990) allowed the application of light-cured adhesive resins and the visual confirmation of ideal tray placement and bracket positions. This visibility also allowed the orthodontist to clean off excess composite around the brackets and apply light cure when fully satisfied with bracket position and hygiene, promoting less plaque accumulation during treatment (Kalange 2004;Zanini 2016;Aggarwal and Aggarwal 2018). Additionally, the various advantages of indirect technique have remained, especially the better visualization of teeth in the model than in patient's mouth, offering greater precision in bracket positioning (Guenthner and Larson 2007;Agarwal and Kulshrestha 2017;Singh et al 2019) and improving ability to bond posterior teeth (Aggarwal and Aggarwal 2018;Kalra et al 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This visibility also allowed the orthodontist to clean off excess composite around the brackets and apply light cure when fully satisfied with bracket position and hygiene, promoting less plaque accumulation during treatment (Kalange 2004;Zanini 2016;Aggarwal and Aggarwal 2018). Additionally, the various advantages of indirect technique have remained, especially the better visualization of teeth in the model than in patient's mouth, offering greater precision in bracket positioning (Guenthner and Larson 2007;Agarwal and Kulshrestha 2017;Singh et al 2019) and improving ability to bond posterior teeth (Aggarwal and Aggarwal 2018;Kalra et al 2018). Literature also mentions the reduced chair time (Kalange 2004;Pamukçu and Özsoy 2016;Li et al 2019;Singh et al 2019) and the possibility of simultaneous bonding of several accessories (Kalange 2004;Aggarwal and Aggarwal 2018), so making the procedure attractive to both operator and patient.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, the various advantages of indirect technique have remained, especially the better visualization of teeth in the model than in patient's mouth, offering greater precision in bracket positioning (Guenthner and Larson 2007;Agarwal and Kulshrestha 2017;Singh et al 2019) and improving ability to bond posterior teeth (Aggarwal and Aggarwal 2018;Kalra et al 2018). Literature also mentions the reduced chair time (Kalange 2004;Pamukçu and Özsoy 2016;Li et al 2019;Singh et al 2019) and the possibility of simultaneous bonding of several accessories (Kalange 2004;Aggarwal and Aggarwal 2018), so making the procedure attractive to both operator and patient. Some variations have been described to carry out this technique over the years with several advances, standing out especially on the adhesive used to attach brackets to casts (Sondhi 2007) and on the transfer tray material used, eg, thermal glue (White 1999), rapid prototyped (Ciuffolo et al 2006), silicone (Guenthner and Larson 2007), vacuum-formed (Sondhi 2007), vinil polysiloxane (Grünheid et al 2016), or associated methods (Ciuffolo et al 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Indirect orthodontic bonding with drop-shaped hot glue tray: a simple and cost-effective technique

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite being associated with more accuracy, the indirect bonding procedure is not yet the gold standard, probably because of sensitivity of the numerous variables that must be controlled. The aim of this article was to present a modified, standardized, and low-cost indirect bonding technique that allows this procedure to be performed successfully. The technique covers an initial clinical stage, to obtain the models; a laboratory stage, which involves placement of brackets on the models following the facial axis of the clinical crown and the labial projection of the marginal ridges of the posterior teeth and construction of transfer tray using hot glue; and a second clinical stage, to properly transfer the brackets to patient’s teeth. Hot glue used to build the tray molds the teeth and perfectly adapts to the teeth, having enough stiffness to maintain their anatomy and the position of the brackets, but also presenting adequate flexibility to allow removal of the tray avoiding excessive stress over the brackets. In conclusion, the new simplified indirect bonding technique presented here provides a precise placement of brackets on the models, a cheaper way to transfer them to patient, and an easy removal of transfer tray, being a very simple and cost-effective method.

show abstract

“…Then direct bonding in orthodontics practice enabled the clinician to position the bracket directly on the tooth, thus eliminating the use of banding and also improve the accuracy of bracket position to certain level. 3 The disadvantage of this technique was ,it requires more chair side time and limited visibility makes, access and placement of brackets especially on posterior teeth quite difficult. Aiming at improving the precision and attaining excellence in orthodontic procedures silverman et al in 1972 4 develop indirect bonding technique.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Accuracy and Time Duration Between Direct and Indirect Bonding By Photographic Method: A Short Clinical Study

Singh¹,

Kumar²,

Bn³

et al. 2019

IJCMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Indirect bonding has been in orthodontics for a long time. It has been recognized that accurate bracket positioning is of clinical importance for efficient application of biomechanics. Previosly so many methods have been used for checking accuracy which is very technique sensitive, require special equipments, difficult to fabricate and cost effective. Here, to make it more simplified, photographic method is used for accuracy measurement. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy, and time consuming between direct and indirect bonding by photographic method. Material and methods: Study was performed on 5 patients with split mouth technique in upper arch where brackets were bonded on one quadrant of orthodontic models for Indirect bonding one set as predetermined "ideal" bonding. A transfer tray was prepared using biostar sheet and glue gun, then tray is placed into patients mouth and other half quadrant was directly bonded to patients teeth. The accuracy was checked using photographic method in three parameters Bracket height, Mesiodistal position and Angulation. Time taken for bonding direct and indirect procedures were calculated. Results Unpaired t test was done which showed statistical significant difference in bracket height and angulation and insignificant for mesiodistal position. Proving indirect bonding is more accurate and less time consuming than the direct bonding of braces. Conclusion: There is difference between mean bracket placement errors for direct and indirect methods, the range of errors in the three directions assessed and time taken were greater for direct than indirect bracket placement. The magnitudes of the findings are of clinically relevant and this method is clinically feasible and cost ineffective.

show abstract

Indirect Bonding Procedures in Orthodontics - A Review

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Dependability Of A Digital Indirect Bonding Approach Using E-models And Two Transfer Trays

Dependability Of A Digital Indirect Bonding Approach Using E-models And Two Transfer Trays

Indirect orthodontic bonding with drop-shaped hot glue tray: a simple and cost-effective technique

Comparison of Accuracy and Time Duration Between Direct and Indirect Bonding By Photographic Method: A Short Clinical Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About