2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect boundary element method solution to the seismic ground motion of near-fault sedimentary valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and 19 illustrate the spatial distribution of the means and COVs of PGAs and PGVs in a mountainvalley site under different fault dip angles. The horizontal and vertical PGA and PGV means at any position decrease as the fault dip angle increases, which is consistent with previous research[41]. For example, in Case 1, for a dip angle of 30°, the maximum mean value of vertical PGA reaches 0.96 g, while the maximum mean value of PGA in the same direction under a 60° dip angle condition is only 0.47 g. Similar situations also occur in PGVs.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…and 19 illustrate the spatial distribution of the means and COVs of PGAs and PGVs in a mountainvalley site under different fault dip angles. The horizontal and vertical PGA and PGV means at any position decrease as the fault dip angle increases, which is consistent with previous research[41]. For example, in Case 1, for a dip angle of 30°, the maximum mean value of vertical PGA reaches 0.96 g, while the maximum mean value of PGA in the same direction under a 60° dip angle condition is only 0.47 g. Similar situations also occur in PGVs.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…in Case 1, the variability of vertical PGAs is higher than other conditions; however, the spatial distribution of COVs is regular. This situation has been analyzed in detail in our previous study [41].…”
Section: Pga and Pgv Distributionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations