Indirectly productive entrepreneurship

Abstract

Purpose – Since Baumol (1990), the economic literature has distinguished between two broad categories of entrepreneurship: productive and unproductive. The purpose of this paper is to introduce another subcategory: indirectly productive entrepreneurship. Sometimes, profit-seeking entrepreneurs allocate their talents to indirectly productive activities to mitigate the new costs market participants endure as a result of a government regulation. The resources used to mitigate these costs must be diverted from other uses. Design/methodology/approach – This paper uses the example of cell phone storage outside New York City’s high schools to illustrate an indirectly productive entrepreneurial activity that mitigates the inefficiencies or costs created by a regulation. These costs and the resulting entrepreneurship would not have arisen absent the regulation. Findings – These profit opportunities do not result from market entrepreneurial errors or successes but emerge from inefficiencies or unintended consequences produced by government regulations. When evaluating such entrepreneurship, the question is whether such regulation is desirable from an efficiency viewpoint because such entrepreneurship, while making such regulation less inefficient or less costly, diverts resources from other lines of production. Originality/value – This paper identifies a new category of entrepreneurship: indirectly productive entrepreneurship. This paper also shows that government regulation often deters productive entrepreneurship. However, under some circumstances, regulation can indirectly encourage productive entrepreneurship by creating artificial profit opportunities that would not have existed otherwise.

The Impact of Entrepreneurship Initiatives in Enhancing Creativity and Innovation

“…It is also worth recognizing that the entrepreneurship as a concept has been evolving over years and that its conceptualization has also been changing. For example, in the middle ages, entrepreneurship was used to refer to an individual's ability to manage large production projects (Padilla and Cachanosky, 2016). This way, the focus was on the individual's ability to manage the projects using the available resources but not on the ability of individual to take risks.…”

Where do they go for advice? Entrepreneurs’ advice-seeking behavior in Africa

“…As such, given that this option is sometimes not available to most new and small businesses, they resort to approaches that alter the institutions through their market activities (Elert, Henrekson, & Stenkula, 2017). Prior studies (e.g., Padilla & Cachanosky, 2016;Lawrence & Suddaby 2006) suggest that survival amidst institutional voids necessitates an adequate level of learning in order to create innovative initiatives to exploit the opportunities from institutional gaps and alleviate the negative influence of institutional inefficiencies. This is especially because advice seeking is vital for understanding what is actually happening in the environment in order to take advantage of the type of institutional void present and identify business opportunities that will lead to the creation of a new business venture and or further enhance their current business offering.…”

Extending the potential of Baumol’s entrepreneurial allocation theory

“…Future research can focus on the importance of different types of networking in different stages of business emergence. Fifth, a few recent research have revealed that some entrepreneurs perceive institutional gaps or voids as profit opportunities to be exploited (Padilla and Cachanosky, 2016;Smallbone and Welter, 2012). Such entrepreneurs, through their entrepreneurial initiatives, sometimes change the whole institutional structure in which they are located.…”