2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual-based modeling as a decision tool for the conservation of the endangered huemul deer (Hippocamelus bisulcus) in southern Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, dog attack was an important cause of death in BBD. Feral dog attack is considered one of the main causes of deer species admission to rescue and rehabilitation centers in Chile [ 58 ], and it is an important threat in the Chilean huemul ( Hippocamelus bisulcus ) [ 59 ] and Pudu ( Pudu spp.) [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, dog attack was an important cause of death in BBD. Feral dog attack is considered one of the main causes of deer species admission to rescue and rehabilitation centers in Chile [ 58 ], and it is an important threat in the Chilean huemul ( Hippocamelus bisulcus ) [ 59 ] and Pudu ( Pudu spp.) [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once again, archeological evidence (Fernández et al 2015;L'Heureux 2016) and close sights in Chilean territory (Smith-Flueck et al 2011;Garay et al 2016), as well as oral tradition of some ranchers (e.g., Stag River ranch), support the idea that the species occurred there in the past. In this sense, the decline of huemul can be due to different human related factors (López-Alfaro et al 2012;Corti et al 2013;Briceño et al 2013) which greatly impacted the marginal huemul populations (north and southern distribution areas in the province) in those ecosystems with greater ranching activities (e.g., steppe and N. antarctica forests under silvopastoral uses). Regarding to climate, huemul occupies a narrow environmental conditions associated to the mountain regions.…”
Section: Hsm and Environmental Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Argentina, one endemic medium-sized deer (Hippocamelus bisulcus Molina, commonly named as huemul) is the most endangered species of Patagonia (Black-Decima et al 2016), being the flag species for several conservation programs (Flueck and Smith-Flueck 2006;Smith-Flueck et al 2011;Vidal et al 2011). Some authors sustain that this species presented a marked decrease in its geographical distribution due to a combination of several factors, e.g., habitat loss, trade-offs with domestic species (cattle or dogs), poaching, malnutrition, and infectious disease (Díaz and Smith-Flueck 2000;López-Alfaro et al 2012;Corti et al 2011Corti et al , 2013. Several conservation efforts in Southern Patagonia had been conducted without clear knowledge about species habitat requirement and/or the effectiveness of the current natural reserve network (National and Provincial reserves) (Frid 2001;Vila et al 2006;Luque et al 2011;Martínez Pastur et al 2016).The objective of this study was to elaborate a potential HSM for huemul in Santa Cruz province (Argentina).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ecological edge effects have been widely observed in real [1] and simulated ecosystems [4]. In contrast, rigid-boundary edge effects, also called border bias [5], occur along the outer portion of sampled data and of simulated systems that have a rigid outer boundary [6,7]. For example, analyses of point pattern data noted as early as 1954 that while statistical methods assume an infinite space, since the sampled data are from a finite space, parameter estimates will be more biased the closer they are to the boundary of the sampled space [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, analyses of point pattern data noted as early as 1954 that while statistical methods assume an infinite space, since the sampled data are from a finite space, parameter estimates will be more biased the closer they are to the boundary of the sampled space [6]. Relatedly, in landscape-scale simulations of animal dispersal [7] and forest fires [8] the rigid-boundary edge effects resulted in reduced predictions of, respectively, the occurrence of animals and fires. These reductions happen because while the interior of the landscape would receive animals or fires from all directions, the edge of the finite landscape could only receive them from the interior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%