2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in executive function predict distinct eating behaviours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
82
3
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
5
82
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the effectiveness of inhibitory control training differs according to the characteristics of the target health behaviour. For example, research has demonstrated a stronger relationship between inhibitory control and health risk behaviours such as snack consumption, compared to health enhancing behaviours such as fruit and vegetable consumption (Allom & Mullan, 2014;Hall, 2012). Further, McEachan, Lawton, and Conner (2010) offered a framework for classifying and predicting health behaviours based on the unique characteristics of the behaviour, suggesting that not all health behaviours have the same determinants.…”
Section: Potential Moderators Of Training Effectmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is possible that the effectiveness of inhibitory control training differs according to the characteristics of the target health behaviour. For example, research has demonstrated a stronger relationship between inhibitory control and health risk behaviours such as snack consumption, compared to health enhancing behaviours such as fruit and vegetable consumption (Allom & Mullan, 2014;Hall, 2012). Further, McEachan, Lawton, and Conner (2010) offered a framework for classifying and predicting health behaviours based on the unique characteristics of the behaviour, suggesting that not all health behaviours have the same determinants.…”
Section: Potential Moderators Of Training Effectmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Memory loss and the inability to initiate or continue effective eating strategies have been associated with the presence of food intake problems in patients with dementia (Aziz et al, 2008;Suto et al, 2014). Moreover, different cognitive functions, specifically frontal lobe based executive functions such as cognitive control, inhibition of inappropriate behavioural responses, ability to flexibly switch among strategies and so on, are implicated in the regulation of eating (Allom & Mullan, 2014). For example, deficits in inhibitory control are associated with altered eating behaviour and weight outcomes.…”
Section: Cognition and Moodmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is evidence that lower self-rated global EF is associated with disinhibited eating, food cravings (Spinella & Lyke, 2004), and unhealthy snack intake (Adriaanse, Kroese, Gillebaart, & De Ridder, 2014;Riggs, Chou, Spruijt-Metz, & Pentz, 2010;Riggs, Spruijt-Metz, Chou, & Pentz, 2012), as well as with a lower consumption of fruit and vegetables four months later (Riggs et al, 2010). Furthermore, two studies reported associations between lower scores on a cool WM updating measure and a lower intake of fruit and vegetables (Allom & Mullan, 2014), as well as a tendency for participants who scored lower on a hot affective decision-making task to overeat when feeling depressed (Davis et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In adults, associations between reduced inhibitory control and different aspects of eating have been demonstrated, such as less healthy food choices (e.g., Jasinska et al, 2012), eating in response to negative emotional states or external food cues (e.g., Elfhag & Morey, 2008), binge eating (see Fischer, Smith, & Cyders, 2008;Waxman, 2009, for reviews), and saturated fat intake (e.g. Allom & Mullan, 2014). In addition to these correlational findings, a few experimental studies suggest a causal role of inhibitory control in eating behavior, in that increasing impulsivity leads to a higher food intake, and increasing inhibition to a lower food intake (Guerrieri, Nederkoorn, Schrooten, Martijn, & Jansen, 2009;Houben, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%