2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences in Impulsivity Predict Head Motion during Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides valuable data for understanding the human mind and brain disorders, but in-scanner head motion introduces systematic and spurious biases. For example, differences in MRI measures (e.g., network strength, white matter integrity) between patient and control groups may be due to the differences in their head motion. To determine whether head motion is an important variable in itself, or just simply a confounding variable, we explored individual differences in psychologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
81
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
16
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings align with the (phenotypic) association of HM with (self reported) impulsivity in a similar age group (r=0.10) and in children (r=0.34) [321]. We also found a significant phenotypic correlation between HM and inattention, which has not been reported before [321].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings align with the (phenotypic) association of HM with (self reported) impulsivity in a similar age group (r=0.10) and in children (r=0.34) [321]. We also found a significant phenotypic correlation between HM and inattention, which has not been reported before [321].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We also found a significant phenotypic correlation between HM and inattention, which has not been reported before [321]. We expanded prior findings [321] by showing that the association was driven by genetic factors common to HM and ADHD rather than by experimental conditions (environmental). Indeed, the genetic correlation coefficients were around 0.2 between HM and the SWAN scores.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations