1970
DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1970.tb00178.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences in the Measurement of Early Cognitive Growth

Abstract: Before proceeding to the text itself it would be helpful to preview what is to follow; this would allow the reader to arrange the SUbsequent material into the pattern intended by the writer. The chapter is divided into several sections which have the function of moving from the more general to the highly specific. The first section deals with some broad issues surrounding the topic of attention. The second section, as a consequence of this earlier discussion, proposes some models for viewing the attentional pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the well-known studies of categorical perception have compared the infant's tendencies to discriminate between stimuli drawn from an acoustic continuum with discrimination performance of adult listeners. The classic finding is that infants discriminate stimuli that straddle the adult-defined "boundary" between two phonetic categories better than they discriminate two stimuli that represent the same physical difference but fall into a single phonetic category (Eimas, 1974(Eimas, , 1975Eimas, Siqueland, Jusczyk, & Vigorito, 1971), thus replicating the discrimination data obtained with adult listeners (Liberman, Cooper, Shankweiler, & Studdert-Kennedy, 1967). This result has been taken as evidence that infants tend to perceptually group the sounds on either side of a phonetic boundary and that they are Copyright 1982 Psychonomic Society, Inc. 279 0031-5117/82/030279-14$01.65/0 predisposed to hear a discontinuity at the location of the phonetic boundary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the well-known studies of categorical perception have compared the infant's tendencies to discriminate between stimuli drawn from an acoustic continuum with discrimination performance of adult listeners. The classic finding is that infants discriminate stimuli that straddle the adult-defined "boundary" between two phonetic categories better than they discriminate two stimuli that represent the same physical difference but fall into a single phonetic category (Eimas, 1974(Eimas, , 1975Eimas, Siqueland, Jusczyk, & Vigorito, 1971), thus replicating the discrimination data obtained with adult listeners (Liberman, Cooper, Shankweiler, & Studdert-Kennedy, 1967). This result has been taken as evidence that infants tend to perceptually group the sounds on either side of a phonetic boundary and that they are Copyright 1982 Psychonomic Society, Inc. 279 0031-5117/82/030279-14$01.65/0 predisposed to hear a discontinuity at the location of the phonetic boundary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…There are several models of habituation that have been proposed by investigators studying visual perception (Cohen, 1973;Fagan, 1977;Lewis, 1971;McCall, 1971;McCall & McGhee, 1977;Olson, 1976;Sokolov, 1963Sokolov, , 1969. While they differ in some significant respects, each model assumes that in order to demonstrate habituation, the infant must store a composite description of (Le., "remember") the original stimulus and eventually recognize that the stimulus being presented matches the stored representation.…”
Section: Habituation and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lewis's interests in development also extended to the study of infants' and children's cognitive development, including attentional processes, intelligence, and language development (Dodd and Lewis 1969;Freedle and Lewis 1977;Hale and Lewis 1979;Lewis 1971bLewis , 1973Lewis , 1975bLewis , 1976aLewis , b, 1977aLewis , 1978aLewis , 1981aLewis , 1982aLewis and Baldini 1979;Lewis and Cherry 1977;Lewis and Freedle 1977;Lewis and Rosenblum 1977;Lewis et al 1969aLewis et al , 1971McGurk and Lewis 1974).…”
Section: Cognitive Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included (a) a reconsideration of attachment theory and (b) the infant as part of a social network . He also began work on a theory of emotional development (Lewis 1971b;Lewis and Michalson 1983).…”
Section: Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lewis [1971] sug gested that '... it may be possible to explore the mental structure of the organism by determi ning stimulus salience hierarchies. Moreover, by observation of the change in those hier archies, a developmental course in these saliencies may be determined ' [pp.…”
Section: Motivation and Cue Saliencementioning
confidence: 99%