2013
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in the perception of biological motion and fragmented figures are not correlated

Abstract: We live in a cluttered, dynamic visual environment that poses a challenge for the visual system: for objects, including those that move about, to be perceived, information specifying those objects must be integrated over space and over time. Does a single, omnibus mechanism perform this grouping operation, or does grouping depend on separate processes specialized for different feature aspects of the object? To address this question, we tested a large group of healthy young adults on their abilities to perceive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…perhaps due to less familiarity or experience with salsa dancing). Notably, previous studies have documented significant individual differences in terms of biological motion perception [35] – [37] , action adaptability [38] , and fMRI brain responses to biological motion [39] . Understanding why some participants may have inherent difficulty perceiving social interactions could provide an interesting avenue of research for future studies of individual differences in biological motion perception in both normal and clinical populations [40] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…perhaps due to less familiarity or experience with salsa dancing). Notably, previous studies have documented significant individual differences in terms of biological motion perception [35] – [37] , action adaptability [38] , and fMRI brain responses to biological motion [39] . Understanding why some participants may have inherent difficulty perceiving social interactions could provide an interesting avenue of research for future studies of individual differences in biological motion perception in both normal and clinical populations [40] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, researchers have utilized larger participant samples to explore individual differences in biological motion perception, sometimes with contradictory results. These studies have shown that the ability to perceive a fragmented figure within static visual noise is not correlated with the ability to perceive a point-light biological motion display within dynamic visual noise, suggesting that these separate perceptual abilities may be tied to separate neural processes (Jung et al, 2013). However, results of a study by Thomson and Watt (2013) suggest a possible relationship between the perception of embedded figures and biological motion perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These various previous studies have clearly shown individual differences in biological motion perception in humans. In humans these differences include correlations between figure segregation and biological motion perception (Thomson & Watt, 2013, but see Jung et al, 2013), a facing the viewer bias and social interaction anxiety/ inhibition ability (Heenan & Troje, 2015), empathy and biological motion facing (Miller & Saygin, 2013), and motion imagery and direction of biological motion (Miller & Saygin, 2013). Miller andSaygin (2013) claimed (andTroje &Aust, 2013 agreed) that the direction of motion task taps local (motion) neural processes and the facing task taps global (form) neural processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%