Individual differences in trait creativity moderate the state-level mood-creativity relationship

Abstract

The relationship between mood states and state creativity has long been investigated. Exploring individual differences may provide additional important information to further our understanding of the complex mood-creativity relationship. The present study explored the state-level mood-creativity relationship from the perspective of trait creativity. We employed the experience sampling method (ESM) in a cohort of 56 college students over five consecutive days. The participants reported their state creativity on originality and usefulness dimensions at six random points between 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., along with a 10item concurrent mood state report. Their trait creativity was measured by the Guildford Alternative Uses Test (AUT) and the Remote Associates Test (RAT). We found moderating effects of the participants' trait creativity on their state-level mood-creativity relationship. Specifically, whereas the positive correlation between positive mood state and originality of state creativity was stronger for the participants with higher AUT flexibility scores, stronger positive correlations between negative mood state and originality of state creativity were observed for individuals with higher AUT originality scores. Our findings provide evidence in support of introducing individual differences to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the mood-creativity link. The results could be of practical value, in developing individualized mood state regulation strategies for promoting state creativity.

Instructing children to construct ideas into products alters children’s creative idea selection in a randomized field experiment

“…We may also note that while this study investigated whether the expectation of idea implementation affects idea selection among primary school children, it did not investigate the underlying mechanisms why this happens (e.g., emotional aspects of idea selection). For instance, children’s emotional reaction, such as fear of failure, to expected implementation might explain why children have a bias against original ideas in their selection [ 65 , 66 ]. Prior research has showed that people have a natural bias against creativity over feasibility because of uncertainty [ 15 , 52 ].…”

Trait creativity, personality, and physical activity: a structural equation model

“…Additionally, in proud people, trait creativity is related to the executive control of bottom-up processing, and bottom-up information from visions or visual images may be related to trait creativity (9). A previous study found that the creative traits of participants moderated the relationship between their emotions and creativity (10). A survey showed that stressful life events moderated the direct effect of the promotion focus on boundaryless thinking, and also moderated the indirect effect of promotion focus on creativity through boundaryless thinking (11).…”

The role of target difficulty and career tournaments in retaining creative R&D employees

“…One crucial characteristic is a strong learning-goal orientation (hereafter, "learning orientation"; Hirst et al, 2009). Learning orientation is rooted in the achievement motivation literature, which describes how individuals approach, interpret, and respond to achievement situations, and relates to a motivational orientation that places a strong emphasis on the development of skills and mastery of new tasks 2 While a large part of modern research on creativity in accounting and beyond has focused on finding ways to foster creative thinking among employees to achieve creative outcomes (i.e., supporting them in achieving a creative state; e.g., Grabner, 2014;Kachelmeier et al, 2008;Klein & Speckbacher, 2019), the literature equally highlights the importance of selecting and retaining creative employees, who possess "a cognitive style favorable to taking new perspectives on problems, an application of heuristics for the exploration of new cognitive pathways, and a working style conducive to persistent, energetic pursuit of one's work" to boost innovation (i.e., creativity as a trait; Amabile, 1988, p. 131;Amabile & Pillemer, 2012;Zandi et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2020). (Dweck & Leggett, 1988;Elliott & Dweck, 1988;Miron-Spektor & Beenen, 2015;Nicholls & Dweck, 1979;Payne et al, 2007).…”