2014
DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2014.906008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Oral Exams in Mathematics Courses: 10 Years of Experience at the Air Force Academy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature suggests these assessments have the potential to offer valuable insights into students' problem-solving skills and information processing abilities (Bowen, 1994;Orgill and Sutherland, 2008;Walker and Sampson, 2013). Students are often more prepared for oral discussions due to the face-to-face nature of the examination, which motivates them to engage with the material at a deeper level-the assessment requires students do more than just memorize and regurgitate-resulting in better responses (Hambrecht, 2003;Boedigheimer et al, 2015;Iannone and Simpson, 2015). Similarly, instructors are able to engage with students and guide them in their critical thinking on a deep level in a way that written exams cannot facilitate (Gent et al, 1999).…”
Section: Background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature suggests these assessments have the potential to offer valuable insights into students' problem-solving skills and information processing abilities (Bowen, 1994;Orgill and Sutherland, 2008;Walker and Sampson, 2013). Students are often more prepared for oral discussions due to the face-to-face nature of the examination, which motivates them to engage with the material at a deeper level-the assessment requires students do more than just memorize and regurgitate-resulting in better responses (Hambrecht, 2003;Boedigheimer et al, 2015;Iannone and Simpson, 2015). Similarly, instructors are able to engage with students and guide them in their critical thinking on a deep level in a way that written exams cannot facilitate (Gent et al, 1999).…”
Section: Background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, oral exams can better assess conceptual knowledge and relational understanding of mathematics. Furthermore, the literature on oral assessment in mathematics classrooms reports that oral assessments in mathematics: provide immediate feedback and immediate grade; prevent plagiarism; help develop better oral communication skills; promote deep comprehension of the learned material; encourage students to deeply and actively engage with the course material; help students gain ownership of the learned material; help students learn to express technical material clearly and concisely; allow for probing knowledge through dialogue; provide longlasting mathematical knowledge; are authentic; help prepare students for their professional careers; help develop better presentation skills; help students build the confidence; are reactive to students" needs; encourage students to put more effort and time in preparing for it (Boedigheimer, et al, 2015;Lianghuo & Mei, 2007;Iannone & Simpson, 2012, 2015Nelson, 2010;Nor & Shahrill, 2014;Odafe, 2006).…”
Section: Positive and Negative Aspects Of Oral Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramella [17] likewise describes teacher reports of higher scores on oral exam performance, crediting the opportunity to self-correct and think out loud as possible explanations. Other researchers have taken an approach more similar to the current investigation by using correlation coefficients to demonstrate that oral exam scores correlate, but not perfectly so, with written exam scores [21], [22]. While such an analysis is informative, we believe that using further statistical modeling will help give a clearer answer about the value of oral exams.…”
Section: Oral Exams and Traditional Assessments In The Classroommentioning
confidence: 77%