2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-1054-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual significance of olfaction: development of a questionnaire

Abstract: Clinical experience shows that the individual significance of olfactory function varies between subjects. In order to estimate these individual differences we developed a questionnaire to study the subjective importance of the sense of smell. Questions were arranged within three subscales: association with olfactory sensations, application of the sense of smell, and the readiness to draw consequences from the olfactory perception. The questionnaire was shown to be time efficient, suitable for normosmic subject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
137
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
137
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, it was possible to achieve a high return rate. Future studies, however, might also benefit from the use of more established questionnaires, for example, the "Impact of Odor scale" (Wrzesniewski et al 1999), "Importance of Olfaction Questionnaire" (Croy et al 2009), and the "Vividness of Olfactory Imagery Questionnaire" (Gilbert et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this way, it was possible to achieve a high return rate. Future studies, however, might also benefit from the use of more established questionnaires, for example, the "Impact of Odor scale" (Wrzesniewski et al 1999), "Importance of Olfaction Questionnaire" (Croy et al 2009), and the "Vividness of Olfactory Imagery Questionnaire" (Gilbert et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This idea has a long history in Western thought as Classen (1997, p. 4) points out: ''men tended to be linked with the 'rational' senses of sight and hearing, and women with the 'corporeal' senses of smell, taste and touch.'' This belief has wide-spread acceptance today too: Women rate their own sense of smell higher than men do (Wysocki & Gilbert, 1989); they say smell is more important to them (Croy, Buschhu¨ter, Seo, Negoias, & Hummel, 2010;Seo et al, 2011); and that they are generally more attentive and interested in odors (Ferdenzi, Coureaud, Camos, & Schaal, 2008;Havlicek et al, 2008). On the flip side, women also report being more disturbed by odors (Nordin, Bende, & Millqvist, 2004;Nordin, Palmquist, Bende, & Millqvist, 2013); and when they suffer from an olfactory dysfunction, women feel their quality of life is affected much more than men do (Frasnelli & Hummel, 2005).…”
Section: Sex Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemosensory event-related potentials, odor-induced changes of the electroencephalogram (EEG), the electroolfactogram and imaging techniques complete the olfactory function evaluation. Because olfaction has an important influence over the patients' quality of life, questionnaires are also used 1,2 . In the USA, olfaction is evaluated mainly through psychophysical methods.…”
Section: Olfactory Function Assessment -Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%