2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual-tree radial growth in a subtropical broad-leaved forest: The role of local neighbourhood competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding strongly points to belowground competition for water as the likely mechanism generating competitive suppression of growth rates, as has been suggested by other studies of woody plant spatial patterns in the region (Franz et al 2011(Franz et al , 2012. Studies of competition among trees in forests generally show increased performance of models utilizing crown area to describe tree size, reflective of size-asymmetric competition for light typical in wetter systems (e.g., von Oheimb et al 2011, Fraver et al 2014. Water limitations and drought seasonality characteristic of tropical savannas shift the primary limiting factor to belowground resources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This finding strongly points to belowground competition for water as the likely mechanism generating competitive suppression of growth rates, as has been suggested by other studies of woody plant spatial patterns in the region (Franz et al 2011(Franz et al , 2012. Studies of competition among trees in forests generally show increased performance of models utilizing crown area to describe tree size, reflective of size-asymmetric competition for light typical in wetter systems (e.g., von Oheimb et al 2011, Fraver et al 2014. Water limitations and drought seasonality characteristic of tropical savannas shift the primary limiting factor to belowground resources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Since quantitative information about previous management or natural disturbances is often unreliable or unavailable, most studies specifically focus on stands that are close to the maximum stand density and select at least one plot for each treatment at each site [52,53]. When this cannot be done, these factors have been accounted for by using structured equation models [3, 4•, 49•], multiple regression and grouping the data by site and density [54], and by analyzing tree-level patterns using neighborhood indices [45,55,56].…”
Section: Stand Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has frequently been demonstrated that tree growth in stands with closed canopies is largely a function of local neighborhood competition and that the nature of this competition is mainly size-asymmetric (Oheimb et al, 2011;Grabarnik & Särkkä, 2011). The nature of competition and not only its intensity has proved an important factor driving forest dynamics and the resulting structure (Toda et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%