Individualisierung der Belastungssteuerung in der kardiologischen stationären Rehabilitation

Abstract

The results prove the effectiveness and efficacy of the modular individualized rehabilitation program. They further suggest the need for an individual program matrix instead of a maximum performance matrix in cardiac rehabilitation. Individualization should be based on clinical and performance diagnostics before and accompanying assessments of training condition, e.g. by HRV measurements, during rehabilitation programs. Each patient should only perform those intervention programs which match the results of the basic clinical investigation and additional analyses during rehabilitation.

The Impact of Medical Face Masks and Rehabilitation Duration on the Performance Output and Outcomes of Cardiologic Rehabilitants

“…Either the patients need more intense or better individualized training in the second half of their rehabilitation, as they have already improved their performance levels after the first 1-2 weeks, or the daily training sessions cause them too much exhaustion, which limits further improvements. Behrens et al [26] have shown that an individualized training program with reduced training sessions for cardiac patients can be beneficial when compared to a daily standard program. In this regard, our data show that standard 3-or 4-week rehabilitation programs with or without face masks improve the fitness of cardiological patients equally, suggesting that upgrades to the rehabilitation training to gain even better improvements are still possible.…”

Modification of the Forms of Self-Determined Regulation and Quality of Life after a Cardiac Rehabilitation Programme: Tennis-Based vs. Bicycle Ergometer-Based

“…Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a programme supervised by professionals that helps people recover from heart attacks and their associated surgery [1]. It has been shown to be an effective tool for improving body composition [2,3], functional capacity and physical fitness [4][5][6], heart rate variability (HRV) [7,8] and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [9,10]. However, and despite the unquestionable benefits provided by CRPs, a study performed in 28 European countries concluded that less than half of the cardiovascular patients benefited from a CRP [11], and, in fact, the benefits were generally transitory as patients dropped out of the programmes [12].…”