2008
DOI: 10.1080/09700160802404562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indo-US Counter-Terrorism Cooperation: Rhetoric Versus Substance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In India-US relations were considered weak prior to 2005, but have become far closer since the nuclear deal discussed here (Balachandran, 2007;D'Souza, 2008). Mohan…”
Section: The Anglosphere and Neoliberal Economic Discoursementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In India-US relations were considered weak prior to 2005, but have become far closer since the nuclear deal discussed here (Balachandran, 2007;D'Souza, 2008). Mohan…”
Section: The Anglosphere and Neoliberal Economic Discoursementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Given their different priorities, Washington perceived Pakistan's role in Kashmiri militancy through the lens of the India-Pakistan conflict. In America's eye, India's terrorism problem was 'regional' and as a consequence did not have global implications that required close cooperation (D'Souza 2008(D'Souza , 1067(D'Souza -1084. For the US, the main aim is to prevent attacks on the homeland and/or US interests in other parts of the world.…”
Section: Differing Approach Towards Terrorismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…India's support to the US effort to fight against WMD is conditioned by its demographic constraint, domestic politics and its good relationship with the Middle Eastern countries such as Iran, Iraq and Persian Gulf nations, which are also its main source of petroleum products. India is home to the second-largest Muslim population in the world and it is concerned that joining the US-led coalition may push its Muslim population towards extremism (D'Souza 2008(D'Souza , 1067(D'Souza -1084. India thus did not join the US-led War on Iraq and did not send any troops.…”
Section: Differing Approach Towards Terrorismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation