2016
DOI: 10.1109/mwc.2016.7498078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor smartphone localization via fingerprint crowdsourcing: challenges and approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasons behind such contradiction include: (1) reporting the accuracy as mean positioning error distance; (2) testing the IPS in specific (probably controlled) environments; and (3) testing the IPS without considering temporal signals changes. The previous challenges have been addressed, e.g., by: (1) providing other metrics such as 75 percentile instead of the mean [8]; (2) providing databases [9,10]; and (3) periodically updating the IPS training data [11][12][13] or making the positioning method adaptable to signal changes [14,15]. Methods able to cope with temporal signal variation, such as those in Gu et al [14], Hayashi et al [15], are tested with measurements that allow the analysis of short-term signal variations occurred at known positions (e.g., seconds or minutes apart, caused by network devices dynamic behavior, network usage, and people movement) and also the analysis of long-term signal variations (e.g., days or months apart, caused by changes in network devices' configuration or environment' structure).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reasons behind such contradiction include: (1) reporting the accuracy as mean positioning error distance; (2) testing the IPS in specific (probably controlled) environments; and (3) testing the IPS without considering temporal signals changes. The previous challenges have been addressed, e.g., by: (1) providing other metrics such as 75 percentile instead of the mean [8]; (2) providing databases [9,10]; and (3) periodically updating the IPS training data [11][12][13] or making the positioning method adaptable to signal changes [14,15]. Methods able to cope with temporal signal variation, such as those in Gu et al [14], Hayashi et al [15], are tested with measurements that allow the analysis of short-term signal variations occurred at known positions (e.g., seconds or minutes apart, caused by network devices dynamic behavior, network usage, and people movement) and also the analysis of long-term signal variations (e.g., days or months apart, caused by changes in network devices' configuration or environment' structure).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they have a well-known challenge: labels quality [13]. A professional collection approach can provide reliable measurements to discover insights into short-and long-term signals variability that could otherwise be untrustworthy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the approaches for deploying location-based services, Relative Signal Strength (RSS) fingerprinting is one of the most promising approaches. However, there are some challenges that need to be considered in the deployment of such approach including fingerprint annotation and device diversity [26]. The use of fingerprint-based approaches to identify an indoor position has been studied well in the past decade.…”
Section: B Review Of Indoor Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSFM-based localization method is an attractive topic in wireless indoor localization [25,26,27,28,29]. Chang et al [25] integrated Pedestrian Dead Reckoning (PDR) with WiFi fingerprinting to provide an accurate positioning algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al proposed some effective fingerprinting-based indoor location methods, such as the surface fitting technique-based indoor localization method [27] and the Curve Fitting (CF) and location search-based indoor localization scheme [28]. For reducing the computation complexity during the localization process, Wang et al [29] proposed a new indoor subarea localization scheme via fingerprint crowdsourcing, clustering and matching, which first constructs subarea fingerprints from crowdsourced RSS measurements and relates them to indoor layouts. Since this localization method does not need any additional hardware, it is a low-cost and easily executed localization technology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%