1983
DOI: 10.1111/jph.1983.107.1.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced Resistance to Viral Infection and Soluble Protein Alterations in Cucumber and Cowpea Plants

Abstract: The formation of tobacco necrosis virus‐elicited local lesions led to a localized “resistance” in cowpea leaves and cucumber cotyledons with an “acquired systemic resistance” induced in cucumber first leaves, following homogolous challenge. The “resistance” was against symptom expression rather than against virus multiplication. A similar “resistance” in both species could be elicited by spraying healthy tissue with polyacrylic acid 4 days before inoculation or osmotically‐stressing cowpea leaves 24 h before i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these observations strengthen the hypothesis that PRs are involved in acquired resistance, several findings are difficult to reconcile with this view (19). Similar discrepancies have also been noted in N. glutinosa (18), cucumber (15,20) and cowpea (15). This finding shows that the connection between the presence of PRs and the reduction in virus multiplication and spread may not be direct, and suggests that PRs are not responsible for acquired resistance.…”
Section: Possible Functions Of Pathogenesis-related Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Although these observations strengthen the hypothesis that PRs are involved in acquired resistance, several findings are difficult to reconcile with this view (19). Similar discrepancies have also been noted in N. glutinosa (18), cucumber (15,20) and cowpea (15). This finding shows that the connection between the presence of PRs and the reduction in virus multiplication and spread may not be direct, and suggests that PRs are not responsible for acquired resistance.…”
Section: Possible Functions Of Pathogenesis-related Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 50%