2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2108.01162
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions II. Toward walls and their line graphs in graphs of bounded degree

Abstract: This paper is motivated by the following question: what are the unavoidable induced subgraphs of graphs with large treewidth? Aboulker et al. made a conjecture which answers this question in graphs of bounded maximum degree, asserting that for all k and ∆, every graph with maximum degree at most ∆ and sufficiently large treewidth contains either a subdivision of the (k × k)-wall or the line graph of a subdivision of the (k × k)-wall as an induced subgraph. We prove two theorems supporting this conjecture, as f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [2], with Dibek, Rzążewski and Vušković, we gave an affirmative answer to this question. More generally, it is also conjectured in [1] that there is an affirmative answer to Question 1.2 restricted to graphs of bounded maximum degree.…”
Section: Theorem 11 ([15]mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [2], with Dibek, Rzążewski and Vušković, we gave an affirmative answer to this question. More generally, it is also conjectured in [1] that there is an affirmative answer to Question 1.2 restricted to graphs of bounded maximum degree.…”
Section: Theorem 11 ([15]mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This is still open, while several interesting special cases of it are proved in earlier papers of this series [2,4]. In the same vein, the following may be true as far as we know (this is a variant of a conjecture of [18]): Conjecture 1.9.…”
Section: Conjecture 18 ([1]mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We start with the following lemma (see Lemma 18 in [4] for a variation of this lemma). This proof of Lemma 5.1 originally appeared in [1], but we include it here for completeness. Lemma 5.1.…”
Section: Forcers For (C 4 Prism)-free Perfect Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%

Submodular functions and perfect graphs

Abrishami,
Chudnovsky,
Dibek
et al. 2021
Preprint
Self Cite
“…Robertson and Seymour famously gave a complete answer to this question in the case of subgraphs. By W k×k we denote the (k × k)-wall; see [2] for a full definition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%