2018
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2018/890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inducible Clindamycin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates From Tertiary Care Hospital, Bettiah, India

Abstract: BACKGROUND Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of bacterial infections in both developed and developing countries. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends D-test, which is a phenotypic screening method for inducible Clindamycin resistance. Therefore, all erythromycin resistant S. aureus should be tested for inducible Clindamycin resistance to prevent Clindamycin treatment failures and to report prevalence resistant phenotypes which varies widely. MATERIALS AND METHODS This cross… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found the constitutive (cMLSB) resistance phenotype in this study to be 47.9%, which is higher than the 35.7% (30/84 isolates) reported by Goudarzi et al [28] , and the 28.6% (2/7 isolates) reported by Gadekar et al [27] . Our result is not surprising, as many studies have associated a large percentage of cMLSB with MRSA isolates than MSSA isolates [29] . The majority of the MRSA isolates in this study were D-test negative, suggesting that if a large percentage (47.9%) of our tested isolates were tested with clindamycin, then treatment would be effective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We found the constitutive (cMLSB) resistance phenotype in this study to be 47.9%, which is higher than the 35.7% (30/84 isolates) reported by Goudarzi et al [28] , and the 28.6% (2/7 isolates) reported by Gadekar et al [27] . Our result is not surprising, as many studies have associated a large percentage of cMLSB with MRSA isolates than MSSA isolates [29] . The majority of the MRSA isolates in this study were D-test negative, suggesting that if a large percentage (47.9%) of our tested isolates were tested with clindamycin, then treatment would be effective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This difference could be due to prolonged hospital stay, instrumentation and other invasive procedures. A comparable prevalence rate of 24, 34.6%, and 36.6% were also reported from Northern Bihar, and West Champaran Bihar17,18,19 Although MRSA from clinical specimens showed higher susceptibility to individual antibiotics when compared with others, we obtained high percentage of multidrug resistant MRSA from these specimens. Poddar CK, et al From Bihar had reported 24% of the MRSA isolated from clinical specimens to be multidrug resistant 17.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…In another study 13 18 Rajak KC, Poddar CK, et al From Bihar reported even a higher percentage of multidrug MRSA but from high risk patients admitted in burns and orthopaedic units. 19 In our study we also looked forward for treatment options for Methicillin resistant S. aureus isolates by detecting their antimicrobial susceptibility to various other antibiotics. It was found that all isolates with Methicillin resistant S. aureus isolates were 100% susceptible to linezolid and vancomycin, followed by moderate susceptibility (70, 14%) to gentamicin, cefuroxime and least susceptibility to doxycycline, ciprofloxacin (22.81% and 20.95% respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparable prevalence rate of 24, 34.6%, and 36.6% were also reported from Northern Bihar, and West Champaran Bihar. 17,18,19 Although MRSA from clinical specimens showed higher susceptibility to individual antibiotics when compared with others, we obtained high percentage of multidrug resistant MRSA from these specimens from Bihar had reported 24% of the MRSA isolated from clinical specimens to be multidrug resistant. 17 Northern Bihar had reported a higher percentage of multidrug resistant MRSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%