To study the regulation of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) latency-associated transcript (LAT) expression and processing in the absence of other cis and trans viral functions, a transgenic mouse containing the region encompassing the LAT promoter (LAP1) and the LAT 5 exon through the 2.0-kb intron was created. LAT expression was detectable by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in a number of tissues, including the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), trigeminal ganglia (TG), brain, skin, liver, and kidney. However, when the accumulation of the 2.0-kb LAT intron was analyzed at the cellular level by in situ hybridization, little or no detectable accumulation was observed in the brain, spinal cord, kidney, or foot, although the 2.0-kb LAT intron was detected at high levels (over 90% of neurons) in the DRG and TG. Northern blot analysis detected the stable 2.0-kb LAT intron only in the sensory ganglia. When relative amounts of the spliced and unspliced LAT within the brain, liver, kidney, spinal cord, TG, and DRG were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR, splicing of the 2.0-kb LAT intron was significantly more efficient in the sensory ganglia than in other tissues. Finally, infection of both transgenic mice and nontransgenic littermates with HSV-1 revealed no differences in lytic replication, establishment of latency, or reactivation, suggesting that expression of the LAT transgene in trans has no significant effect on those functions. Taken together, these data indicate that the regulation of expression and processing of LAT RNA within the mouse is highly cell-type specific and occurs in the absence of other viral cis-and trans-acting factors.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) latency has long been characterized by the accumulation of a single abundant RNA, the latency-associated transcript (LAT). From the 8.3-to 8.5-kb polyadenylated primary transcript, a very stable 2.0-kb intron, which can be readily detected in the nuclei of latently infected sensory neurons, is spliced (6,21,29,32). Further processing of the 2.0-kb intron can yield a 1.5-kb product in a subpopulation of neurons (20,31). In sensory ganglia, LAT expression seems to be tightly regulated; during the lytic infection, most neurons express either the LAT or lytic genes, not both (21). In addition, there is a sharp drop in the amount of LAT during reactivation (3, 30), with a decrease in transcriptional permissiveness of the LAT promoter occurring as early as 30 min postexplant (1). These observations, combined with genetic data describing LAT mutants as being defective in reactivation (2,10,13,16,24), have led to the model showing that the LAT RNA may play a role in transcriptional silencing of lytic genes during latency (2,7,15,36). Additionally, a cis element encompassing the promoter and enhancer (rcr) may regulate LAT expression to allow the establishment of latency and the occurrence of reactivation (1,14). Two central questions that have been difficult to address in vivo, however, are (i) how dependent the regulation of LAT transcription on other viral el...