2001
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.75.6.2912-2920.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inducible Cyclic AMP Early Repressor Produces Reactivation of Latent Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 in Neurons In Vitro

Abstract: Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) establishes a latent infection in neurons of the peripheral nervous system. During latent HSV-1 infection, viral gene expression is limited to latency-associated transcripts (LAT).HSV-1 remains latent until an unknown mechanism induces reactivation. The ability of the latent virus to periodically reactivate and be shed is essential to the transmission of disease. In vivo, the stimuli that induce reactivation of latent HSV-1 include stress, fever, and UV damage to the skin at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, LAT could be a viral response that attempts to protect the neuron during an event that induces apoptosis and/or reactivation (Gill and Windebank, 1998;Perng et al, 2000;Perng et al, 2001; Thompson and Sawtell, 2001). If LAT is serving a protective role during reactivation, a logical explanation would be the accumulation of LAT in cells that become protected and do not support reactivation (i.e., remain latently infected), whereas LAT would fail to accumulate to appreciable levels in cells supporting reactivation (Colgin et al, 2001;Halford et al, 1996). Because our analysis involved RT-PCR, it is not certain if the high levels of LAT are accumulating in the select few cells that reactivate virus, or lower levels are produced in the majority of cells that do not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, LAT could be a viral response that attempts to protect the neuron during an event that induces apoptosis and/or reactivation (Gill and Windebank, 1998;Perng et al, 2000;Perng et al, 2001; Thompson and Sawtell, 2001). If LAT is serving a protective role during reactivation, a logical explanation would be the accumulation of LAT in cells that become protected and do not support reactivation (i.e., remain latently infected), whereas LAT would fail to accumulate to appreciable levels in cells supporting reactivation (Colgin et al, 2001;Halford et al, 1996). Because our analysis involved RT-PCR, it is not certain if the high levels of LAT are accumulating in the select few cells that reactivate virus, or lower levels are produced in the majority of cells that do not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sensory ganglia, LAT expression seems to be tightly regulated; during the lytic infection, most neurons express either the LAT or lytic genes, not both (21). In addition, there is a sharp drop in the amount of LAT during reactivation (3,30), with a decrease in transcriptional permissiveness of the LAT promoter occurring as early as 30 min postexplant (1). These observations, combined with genetic data describing LAT mutants as being defective in reactivation (2,10,13,16,24), have led to the model showing that the LAT RNA may play a role in transcriptional silencing of lytic genes during latency (2,7,15,36).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a difference in the stability of the 2-kb LAT between cells in culture and acutely or latently infected cells in the peripheral nervous system cannot be ruled out. For instance, Colgin et al saw a rapid decrease in the number of neurons expressing LAT in cultured rat dorsal root ganglia induced to reactivate by either nerve growth factor (NGF) withdrawal or addition of forskolin (10), suggesting that LAT may have a shorter half-life in this context. However, those authors attribute this decrease to a downregulation of the LAT promoter and not to stability of the 2-kb LAT RNA itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar protein(s) may bind to the 2-kb LAT and influence debranching and/or the stability of the intron, and mutations such as Bam and Cons may affect the binding of this protein(s). Interestingly, if the half-life of the 2-kb LAT is actually similar in the cultured rat dorsal root ganglion reactivation model described above (10), then down-regulation of the LAT promoter alone would not account for the rapid decrease seen in LAT-positive neurons. Instead, the rapid decrease may indicate a role for an additional factor(s) to decrease the amount of LAT present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%