Cells have developed a variety of mechanisms to respond to heavy metal exposure. Here, we show that the yeast ubiquitin ligase SCF Met30 plays a central role in the response to two of the most toxic environmental heavy metal contaminants, namely, cadmium and arsenic. SCF Met30 inactivates the transcription factor Met4 by proteolysis-independent polyubiquitination. Exposure of yeast cells to heavy metals led to activation of Met4 as indicated by a complete loss of ubiquitinated Met4 species. The association of Met30 with Skp1 but not with its substrate Met4 was inhibited in cells treated with cadmium. Cadmium-activated Met4 induced glutathione biosynthesis as well as genes involved in sulfuramino acid synthesis. Met4 activation was important for the cellular response to cadmium because mutations in various components of the Met4-transcription complex were hypersensitive to cadmium. In addition, cell cycle analyses revealed that cadmium induced a delay in the transition from G 1 to S phase of the cell cycle and slow progression through S phase. Both cadmium and arsenic induced phosphorylation of the cell cycle checkpoint protein Rad53. Genetic analyses demonstrated a complex effect of cadmium on cell cycle regulation that might be important to safeguard cellular and genetic integrity when cells are exposed to heavy metals.
INTRODUCTIONHeavy metals are a major environmental hazard and present a danger to human health. The cause of the cytotoxic effects of heavy metals is not completely understood, but it has been suggested that at least part of their toxicity is due to the formation of hydroxyl radicals, which lead to lipid, protein, and DNA damage (Stohs and Bagchi, 1995;Brennan and Schiestl, 1996;Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1984).As with any cytotoxic and genotoxic insults, all organisms have developed strategies to respond to heavy metal exposure to maintain cellular and genetic integrity. These strategies include detoxification, repair, or removal of damaged molecules, and delay of cell division to prevent propagation of damaged cellular components (Jamieson, 1998).The biological effects of cadmium are perhaps better studied than that of other heavy metals. High affinity for sulfhydryl groups, competition with Zn(II) in proteins, nonspecific interaction with DNA, generation of reactive oxygen species, and depletion of glutathione have been shown to contribute to the toxicity of cadmium (Stohs and Bagchi, 1995;Zalups and Ahmad, 2003;McMurray and Tainer, 2003). Recently, it has been demonstrated in yeast that the genotoxic effects of cadmium are indirect (Jin et al., 2003;McMurray and Tainer, 2003). Rather than by direct DNA damage, cadmium leads to genome instability by inhibition of the DNA mismatch repair system (Jin et al., 2003). Although the mechanism of how cadmium inhibits DNA repair is not clear, it has been suggested that damage of sulfhydryl groups containing components of the mismatch repair system might be responsible (Jin et al., 2003).The damaging effect of cadmium on sulfhydryl groups containing pro...