2002
DOI: 10.1128/iai.70.11.6215-6222.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of Cytolytic Anti-Gal Antibodies in α-1,3-Galactosyltransferase Gene Knockout Mice by Oral Inoculation withEscherichia coliO86:B7 Bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, a strain of E. coli. (O86:B7) that has been shown to bind alpha gal antibodies [25] was incubated over night and the next day a fixed amount of the bacterial suspension was incubated with functional complement and supplemented either with heat inactivated serum from pooled cirrhotic patients (20 patients/pool) or heat inactivated normal serum. Figure 3B shows the pattern of bacterial growth in the presence of serum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, a strain of E. coli. (O86:B7) that has been shown to bind alpha gal antibodies [25] was incubated over night and the next day a fixed amount of the bacterial suspension was incubated with functional complement and supplemented either with heat inactivated serum from pooled cirrhotic patients (20 patients/pool) or heat inactivated normal serum. Figure 3B shows the pattern of bacterial growth in the presence of serum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Thall et al, [28] Posekany et al, [29] Chiang et al, [30] and Dor et al [31] in multiple studies found that cytotoxic anti-Gal α 3Gal antibodies may be induced in concentrations at levels as high as milligrams per milliliter in α 3GalT1 −/− mice and pigs without acute or chronic rejection of self-organs or self-blood vessels, opposite to the implication of this assertion. Paradoxically, Christiansen et al [20] acknowledged that they had generated anti-iGb3 monoclonal antibodies in α 3GalT −/− mice that express the functional iGb3 enzyme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inactivation of the α1,3GT gene, resulting in suppression of α-gal expression in ancestral Old World primates would have eliminated immune tolerance to this epitope and thus enable production of the anti-Gal antibody as means of protection against the pathogen(s) expressing α-gal epitopes. This possibility is supported by the following observations: i) enveloped viruses propagated in cells with active α1,3GT express α-gal epitopes on their glycoproteins, whereas the same virus propagated in cells lacking α1,3GT, do not express α-gal epitopes [55][56][57]; ii) bacteria and protozoa have been found to express carbohydrate epitopes with structures similar to the α-gal epitopes, as indicated by their ability to bind anti-Gal [30,[58][59][60]; and iii) anti-Gal has been shown to destroy viruses and protozoa expressing α-gal epitopes [61][62][63].…”
Section: Possible Causes For the Evolutionary Inactivation Of α13gtmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Individuals successfully suppressing α-gal epitope expression would have lost immune tolerance to the α-gal epitope and would have produced the natural anti-Gal antibody in response to antigenic stimulation by gastrointestinal bacteria expressing carbohydrate epitopes with structures similar to that of the α-gal epitope. Currently, such antigenic stimulation in humans is mediated by a number of bacterial strains in the intestinal flora [30,58].…”
Section: Possible Causes For the Evolutionary Inactivation Of α13gtmentioning
confidence: 99%