1954
DOI: 10.1002/path.1700680228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of epithelial neoplasms in the urinary bladder of the dog by intra‐vesical injection of a chemical carcinogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1969, Deichmann & Radomski when referring to 2-naphthylamine remarked that "after 30 years of investigation the challenge still remains; what is the active carcinogen of these aromatic amines?" It had been recognized very early that 2-naphthylamine per se was not carcinogenic after implantation into the bladder of 8 mice (Bonser et al, 1952) and instillation of 2-naphthylamine into the bladder of one dog (Bonser et al, 1954). Boyland and his colleagues (Boyland et al, 1957) suggested the active urinary pre-carcinogen might be 2 -amino -1 -napthylglucuronide which, when hydrolysed in urine by P-glucuronidase, could release 3,2-amino-i -naphthol, which they postulated was the ultimate reactive carcinogen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1969, Deichmann & Radomski when referring to 2-naphthylamine remarked that "after 30 years of investigation the challenge still remains; what is the active carcinogen of these aromatic amines?" It had been recognized very early that 2-naphthylamine per se was not carcinogenic after implantation into the bladder of 8 mice (Bonser et al, 1952) and instillation of 2-naphthylamine into the bladder of one dog (Bonser et al, 1954). Boyland and his colleagues (Boyland et al, 1957) suggested the active urinary pre-carcinogen might be 2 -amino -1 -napthylglucuronide which, when hydrolysed in urine by P-glucuronidase, could release 3,2-amino-i -naphthol, which they postulated was the ultimate reactive carcinogen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%