1993
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1161(93)90019-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of micronuclei in rat bone marrow and peripheral blood following acute and subchronic administration of azathioprine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…12 For some genotoxic compounds, there is a close relationship between the rate of MN and the expression of p53, 13 carcinogen, did not stimulate p53 expression in mouse fibroblast cells, 14 but it did induce MN in bone marrow and peripheral blood erythrocytes in rats. 15 In this study, p53 mRNA expression in the severe damage group (MN ≥ 4%) was lower than that of the mild damage group (MN < 4%), but p21 mRNA expression in the severe damage group was higher than that of the mild damage group. None of the differences in mRNA expression of p53, p21, and CCND1 between the two groups was significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…12 For some genotoxic compounds, there is a close relationship between the rate of MN and the expression of p53, 13 carcinogen, did not stimulate p53 expression in mouse fibroblast cells, 14 but it did induce MN in bone marrow and peripheral blood erythrocytes in rats. 15 In this study, p53 mRNA expression in the severe damage group (MN ≥ 4%) was lower than that of the mild damage group (MN < 4%), but p21 mRNA expression in the severe damage group was higher than that of the mild damage group. None of the differences in mRNA expression of p53, p21, and CCND1 between the two groups was significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Although the integration of the bone marrow micronucleus assay into general toxicology assays in rats has been reported [Henderson et al, 1993;Asanami et al, 1995;Garriott et al, 1995;Asanami and Shimono, 1996], the peripheral blood micronucleus assay is rarely performed in rats because circulating micronucleated erythrocytes are captured and destroyed in the rat spleen [Schlegel et al, 1982[Schlegel et al, , 1986Schlegel and Macgregor, 1984;Hayashi et al, 1992]. Despite this limitation, micronuclei were observed in the peripheral blood of rats by acridine orange supravital staining technique after treatment with mitomycin C (MMC), cyclophosphamide (CP), and benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) [Hayashi et al, 1992;Shimada et al, 1992].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the standard deviations of control groups are compared with data from manual assays, the deviations are lower than those in most reported studies with rats (13,20,35) but higher than in control groups of mice analysed with the flow cytometric technique (1,42). When the standard deviations of control groups are compared with data from manual assays, the deviations are lower than those in most reported studies with rats (13,20,35) but higher than in control groups of mice analysed with the flow cytometric technique (1,42).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%