1973
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90356-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by UV light and its inhibition by caffeine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The responses of AT cells to ionizing radiation are very similar to those observed when other mammalian cells are irradiated in the presence of caffeine, which (i) prevents inhibition of DNA synthesis (17) by reversing the block to replicon initiation (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), (ii) shortens mitotic delay (19), (iii) increases the incidence of chromosomal aberrations (20), and (iv) enhances cell killing (21,22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The responses of AT cells to ionizing radiation are very similar to those observed when other mammalian cells are irradiated in the presence of caffeine, which (i) prevents inhibition of DNA synthesis (17) by reversing the block to replicon initiation (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), (ii) shortens mitotic delay (19), (iii) increases the incidence of chromosomal aberrations (20), and (iv) enhances cell killing (21,22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In this case, chromosomal aberrations are postulated to occur in damaged chromatin owing to interference of caffeine with replication of damaged DNA strands (daughter strand repair, "postreplication repair"; Kihlman et al, 1974;Roberts et al, 1974;Nilsson and Lehmann, 1975;Kihlman, 1977;Roberts, 1978). A particular characteristic of this system is the frequent and abrupt appearance of metaphase plates, in which all chromosomes are shattered (generalized chromosome shattering, GCS), while other metaphase plates remain intact or show single chromosomal aberrations (Kato, 1973;Roberts et al, 1974;Nilsson and Lehmann, 1975;C. Cremer et al, 1980b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultraviolet light, which is a form of visible light, and phototherapy light have been shown to damage DNA in vitro and in vivo [37][38][39][40][41][42]. However, some studies reported that phototherapy light has no significant impact on nuclear material [43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%