2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-9883(00)00084-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial companies’ demand for electricity: evidence from a micropanel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Woodland, 1993;Bjørner et al, 2001;Arnberg and Bjørner, 2007;Boyd and Lee, 2016;Lundgren et al, 2016;Abeberese, 2017.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woodland, 1993;Bjørner et al, 2001;Arnberg and Bjørner, 2007;Boyd and Lee, 2016;Lundgren et al, 2016;Abeberese, 2017.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the contribution of Bohi and Zimmerman (1984), the next review was Griffin (1993), which focused less on demand price elasticity and more on the new methodologies for econometric modeling of the electricity demand, both on the demand for electricity and its relation to the choice in domestic appliances. In the years following those reviews there were a few studies, and those that were closer to the present study in terms of data structure and methodology are Bjorner et al (2001), and Filippini (1995), which used microdata to estimate the elasticity in the industrial demand for electricity, in the first study, and residential demand in the second. In Bjorner et al 2001, we observe elasticities of around -0.5, and even lower in models which incorporate non-observable heterogeneity such as fixed effects.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Electricity has an enormous effect on the modern world (Forrester, 2016). Also, Bjørner (2001) stated that electricity is the most flexible and clean source of energy that constitutes one of the vital infra-structural and regarded as input in production in the same way as labor, capital etc. in industrial sector.…”
Section: Electricity Industrial Production and Willingness To Pay Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through rationalizing the tariff structure, efficiency improvement and demand side management of electricity in industry, it helps in curtailment the wastage of electricity and thereby reduce the consumption of electricity without affecting the end-use benefits (Ghosh, 2002). Ghaderi et al (2006) found that the number of factories and level of economy activity have greater impact in energy consumption by the industry than the price changes of electricity but (Bjørner et al, 2001) say that considerably lower price and production elasticity are the estimators of electricity demand where industry with a high intensity of electricity have own-price elasticity. On the other hand, Alcorta et al (2013) point out that energy efficiency (EE) has become the new topic of interest for the manufacturing industry as it can reduce both economic and environmental impacts related to the energy consumption whereas Liu et al(2012) identified that industry's involvement level of electricity saving activities (ESAs) in significant and positive influences by energy management level of competitors and internal training on energy saving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%