Industrial Digitalization and Energy Intensity: Evidence From China’s Manufacturing Sector

Abstract

The Chinese manufacturing sector has undergone an accelerated digital transformation. This study examines the impact of industrial digitalization on energy intensity in China. Energy intensity is negatively correlated with digitalization in terms of time trends, cross-sectional differences, and correlation coefficients. Our empirical analysis shows that industrial digitalization significantly increases the energy intensity of the manufacturing sector. With digital transformation, energy intensity first increases and then decreases, yielding an inverted-U-shaped relation. In 2019, more than 80% of the industries had a degree of digitalization below the inflection point.

Digitalization and Energy in Attaining Sustainable Development: Impact on Energy Consumption, Energy Structure, and Energy Intensity

“…Additionally, they identify a significant positive correlation between digital capital intensity and energy intensity. Lan and Wen [142] showed that the industrial digitalization of the manufacturing sector leads to a notable increase in energy intensity. Throughout the process of digital transformation, there is an initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease, forming an inverted U-shaped relationship.…”

“…Throughout the process of digital transformation, there is an initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease, forming an inverted U-shaped relationship. As of 2019, more than 80% of industries exhibited a level of digitalization below the inflection point [142].…”

The Role of Digital Transformation, Corporate Culture, and Leadership in Enhancing Corporate Sustainable Performance in the Manufacturing Sector of China

“…The concept of corporate sustainability pertains to an organization's capacity to fulfill its stakeholders' expectations while concurrently advancing and maintaining development throughout its existence [6]. Researchers have suggested several factors that may contribute to sustainable performance, such as organizations [7], technology [8], intellectual property [9], human resource management [10], knowledge sharing [11], lean procedures [12], corporate culture [13], and others. These factors' significant impact on sustained efficiency justifies their elevated designation as critical performance indicators.…”

Does Intelligence Improve the Total Factor Productivity of China’s Manufacturing Industry?

“…The existing literature has confirmed that intelligence has an important role in the labor force, especially in terms of labor substitution and polarization (Acemoglu & Autor, 2011;Autor et al, 2006;Autor & Salomons, 2018). Intelligence also has a positive role in energy saving, at the same time (Hao & Wu, 2021;Lan & Wen, 2021). Nevertheless, only a few studies have explored the impact of intelligence on TFP.…”